The Nunn, Michaelzewski, and Eu arguments are just more fuel for my logic...
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
(Poll) In His Prime Was Roy Jones Jr Unbeatable?
Collapse
-
-
-
Originally posted by IMDAZED View PostThanks man, I wasn't asking you - I already know the answer. I was specifically asking Battling because he tried to imply that Jones avoided/ducked Nunn. Of course, he took that back.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Hellboy View PostIt would of been a great fight even though Nunn was way past prime at that point. I can't find any of his LHW fights, but I did see his fight with Scully and his legs were "gone", kind of like Jones's legs now.
Comment
-
Originally posted by IMDAZED View PostNunn was still pretty solid at 175 but nowhere near where he was at 160. He still would've given Jones hell. I was actually quite surprised that he lost to Rochigianni but I guess he was a done deal at that point. Rochigianni was past his prime as well and I doubt he would've given Jones much trouble. He was originally slated to face Jones in January 2000 but pulled out and disappeared for some time after that. Nevertheless, the WBA's decisiont o strip him prior to that was an absolute travesty.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by IMDAZED View PostNunn was still pretty solid at 175 but nowhere near where he was at 160. He still would've given Jones hell. I was actually quite surprised that he lost to Rochigianni but I guess he was a done deal at that point. Rochigianni was past his prime as well and I doubt he would've given Jones much trouble. He was originally slated to face Jones in January 2000 but pulled out and disappeared for some time after that. Nevertheless, the WBA's decisiont o strip him prior to that was an absolute travesty.
Nunn never looked comfortable when pressured imo( Barkley), although in his prime he was able to pick off on the way in (Roldan) because he had better reflexes etc.
Comment
Comment