I'm taking all comers, and destroying your debate

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • PensionKiller
    Khan Kills Kell
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Sep 2009
    • 9521
    • 224
    • 207
    • 18,489

    #21
    Stop ducking my video. Once you comment on it I will challenge you

    Comment

    • SplitSecond
      Undisputed Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Nov 2009
      • 23151
      • 1,715
      • 1,187
      • 85,044

      #22
      Originally posted by PensionKiller
      Stop ducking my video. Once you comment on it I will challenge you
      where is it?

      Comment

      • Squabbles94806
        Banned
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Oct 2008
        • 2408
        • 54
        • 104
        • 2,886

        #23
        Originally posted by tehMatrix
        this is for the people that think dirrell was faking
        im really bored, just got home, set up a new pc, for the next 2 hours im up for scorching boxing fan pretenders that never heard of a delayed reaction



        come on you ****ers
        Good luck with your debate. Uhhh..i think your topic for a debate is called fallible reasoning. Sorry. How can you possibly prove or disprove Dirrell was faking being hurt? Well, philosophically speaking, of course he wasn't faking it if the end result of the bout was a DQ. Do i think he was faking or not is another question. You can speculate and assume, but there is no way in actually proving the fact, especially with insubstantial evidence. Even the "delayed reaction" theory is impractical and immaterial. There's no way you can apply that particular theory of science to Dirrell's circumstance in the ring that night. Are you a doctor? Were you at the fight? Did you examine him before and after the bout? Do you have paperwork of his examination for an analysis to compare his status?

        I'd love to hear your "opinions," speculations and your thoughts, but a serious debate? Denied. Sorry. So tell me, why do you think Dirrell was faked being hurt.

        Comment

        • SplitSecond
          Undisputed Champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Nov 2009
          • 23151
          • 1,715
          • 1,187
          • 85,044

          #24
          lol!, i must spread the green before giving it to pension killer again, srry bud

          Comment

          • B.U.R.N.E.R
            ~NSB Legend 2005-2015~
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Feb 2010
            • 30197
            • 1,346
            • 400
            • 47,475

            #25
            Originally posted by Squabbles94806
            Good luck with your debate. Uhhh..i think your topic for a debate is called fallible reasoning. Sorry. How can you possibly prove or disprove Dirrell was faking being hurt? Well, philosophically speaking, of course he wasn't faking it if the end result of the bout was a DQ. Do i think he was faking or not is another question. You can speculate and assume, but there is no way in actually proving the fact, especially with insubstantial evidence. Even the "delayed reaction" theory is impractical and immaterial. There's no way you can apply that particular theory of science to Dirrell's circumstance in the ring that night. Are you a doctor? Were you at the fight? Did you examine him before and after the bout? Do you have paperwork of his examination for an analysis to compare his status?

            I'd love to hear your "opinions," speculations and your thoughts, but a serious debate? Denied. Sorry. So tell me, why do you think Dirrell was faked being hurt.
            I agree Ricky Hatton faked it too vs. Pacquiao.

            Comment

            • SplitSecond
              Undisputed Champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Nov 2009
              • 23151
              • 1,715
              • 1,187
              • 85,044

              #26
              Originally posted by Squabbles94806
              Good luck with your debate. Uhhh..i think your topic for a debate is called fallible reasoning. Sorry. How can you possibly prove or disprove Dirrell was faking being hurt? Well, philosophically speaking, of course he wasn't faking it if the end result of the bout was a DQ. Do i think he was faking or not is another question. You can speculate and assume, but there is no way in actually proving the fact, especially with insubstantial evidence. Even the "delayed reaction" theory is impractical and immaterial. There's no way you can apply that particular theory of science to Dirrell's circumstance in the ring that night. Are you a doctor? Were you at the fight? Did you examine him before and after the bout? Do you have paperwork of his examination for an analysis to compare his status?

              I'd love to hear your "opinions," speculations and your thoughts, but a serious debate? Denied. Sorry. So tell me, why do you think Dirrell was faked being hurt.
              well squabbles, there were doctors with dirrell from the ring all the way to his locker room, i dont remember anyone of them suggesting he was faking, im sure they examined him
              if that makes you feel any better

              Comment

              • CrackYourJaw
                The Boston Celtics
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • May 2009
                • 4925
                • 188
                • 97
                • 13,670

                #27
                Originally posted by tehMatrix
                well squabbles, there were doctors with dirrell from the ring all the way to his locker room, i dont remember anyone of them suggesting he was faking, im sure they examined him
                if that makes you feel any better
                They were in on it, man!

                Can't you see, the man is trying to keep European boxers down?!

                It's a conspiracy!

                Comment

                • Picazo
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Jul 2009
                  • 1119
                  • 22
                  • 1
                  • 7,698

                  #28
                  Originally posted by Tec 9
                  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m06MQnVfy5w

                  Rounds 9 and 10, show me where Abraham was landing anything, all he had was the knock down and a solid punch towards the end of round 9. Pay attention, Dirrell was dodging just about all of these punches. The knockdown was a flash knock down, watch it as he hops right back up.


                  Here's round 11:





                  Show us where Abraham was landing, you have the videos, now show us. Cause all I see is Dirrell out boxing AB, and dodging Ab's wild punches.
                  ahem, ahem.....all abraham needs is ONE PUNCH, son. Watch his other fights, andre gots a decent beard ill give him that. BUT all king arthur needs is one punch to cange the story and he was landing a few man, get with it. Look andre was doing real good man he was, kinda bitchy but good...same cat that was complaining his ass off to froch, SAME CAT. Im putting it passed him to act, boy deserves an oscar. Abraham would have tooken him out...hes still points leader, lets see who gets further in the tourney, lets see!!!!!

                  Comment

                  • SplitSecond
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Nov 2009
                    • 23151
                    • 1,715
                    • 1,187
                    • 85,044

                    #29
                    Originally posted by CrackYourJaw
                    They were in on it, man!

                    Can't you see, the man is trying to keep European boxers down?!

                    It's a conspiracy!
                    hahaha

                    those pricks

                    Comment

                    • SplitSecond
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Nov 2009
                      • 23151
                      • 1,715
                      • 1,187
                      • 85,044

                      #30
                      Originally posted by Tec 9
                      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m06MQnVfy5w

                      Rounds 9 and 10, show me where Abraham was landing anything, all he had was the knock down and a solid punch towards the end of round 9. Pay attention, Dirrell was dodging just about all of these punches. The knockdown was a flash knock down, watch it as he hops right back up.


                      Here's round 11:





                      Show us where Abraham was landing, you have the videos, now show us. Cause all I see is Dirrell out boxing AB, and dodging Ab's wild punches.
                      peeps just think abraham was upping his workrate because abe thought he hurt dirrell(and i do think dirrell was slightly shooken) and wanted to get him out of it in the 10th, he def wasn't gonna go in swinging like that in the 11th, as for the 12th, maybe he could've gotten really desperate, but if he could'nt get dirrell with all those punches thrown other than the punch that knocked him down with in the 10th then his chances were slim in the 12th

                      about a 10% chance

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP