Nope, sorry. Froch cannot count Dirrell as a win on his resume.

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BetterCallSaul
    Shot!
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Dec 2007
    • 9026
    • 598
    • 681
    • 16,488

    #51
    Extremely close fight, but Froch won. Dirrell's running was a disgrace to the sport. If they meet in the semi finals, and Dirrell doesn't run, he will get KO'd again.

    Comment

    • jrosales13
      undisputed champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Sep 2008
      • 32632
      • 738
      • 763
      • 40,023

      #52
      I honestly found that fight tough to score. It was just an ugly messy fight. Even though there was a case that Dirrell you can not call it a robbery IMO because it was tough rounds to score. Dirrell fought horrible in that fight. He could of had an easier but I think the big lights got to him and was not confident enough. Plus the Ring and other media outlets scored the fight for Froch. So it was not a robbery IMO so I have no problem with counting Dirrell on Froch resume.

      Comment

      • xAUGUSTUSx
        Banned
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Aug 2006
        • 2939
        • 113
        • 0
        • 3,173

        #53
        Originally posted by Keyser Soze
        I know what I saw; Carl lumbering forward, hitting thin air, getting beaten to the punch, and even getting rocked a couple of times.

        And now all these discussions about resumes, and people are casually stating Froch beat Dirrell.

        Nah. Sorry, that's bull****. Carl's got a nice resume, he beat Pascal and Taylor, but he didn't beat Dirrell.
        Well it is so shut up!

        Comment

        Working...
        TOP