Comments Thread For: Team Pacquiao: "No Trade-Off on Mayweather Lawsuit"

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • lee majors
    Contender
    • Dec 2007
    • 462
    • 27
    • 1
    • 7,370

    #21
    Originally posted by jonarie
    Honestly, I think the Mayweathers do have great defense in their case.

    This video is PROOF that bullets bounce off of Pacquiao. Those A-Side meth soldiers in Mindanao should be ashamed of themselves.
    Ok, Floyd really needs to whoop Manny ass, pronto!!!! This is way past ridiculous.

    Comment

    • SoldierWarrior
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Mar 2010
      • 3804
      • 86
      • 113
      • 10,191

      #22
      Originally posted by jonarie
      Honestly, I think the Mayweathers do have great defense in their case.

      This video is PROOF that bullets bounce off of Pacquiao. Those A-Side meth soldiers in Mindanao should be ashamed of themselves.
      Where do I get this movie in english subtitles?

      Comment

      • Chip Rudd
        Banned
        Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
        • Aug 2009
        • 265
        • 8
        • 3
        • 297

        #23
        Originally posted by jonarie
        Honestly, I think the Mayweathers do have great defense in their case.

        This video is PROOF that bullets bounce off of Pacquiao. Those A-Side meth soldiers in Mindanao should be ashamed of themselves.
        Man, that crap is freakin hilarious!!! LOL

        Comment

        • Carpe Diem
          Seize the day
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Jan 2010
          • 15986
          • 1,219
          • 981
          • 44,413

          #24
          Who cares. Pacquiao is gonna win against Floyd Sr and Roger, but not Floyd Jr. Floyd never made any quotes of Pacquiao being on steroids. I wonder how they gonna prove that Floyd accused him.

          Comment

          • Carpe Diem
            Seize the day
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Jan 2010
            • 15986
            • 1,219
            • 981
            • 44,413

            #25
            Originally posted by jonarie
            Honestly, I think the Mayweathers do have great defense in their case.

            This video is PROOF that bullets bounce off of Pacquiao. Those A-Side meth soldiers in Mindanao should be ashamed of themselves.

            Manny Pacquiao > Denzel Washington, Al Pacino, Robert De Niro, Michael Douglas, Morgan Freeman, Tom Hanks, ect..He truly deserved an Oscar for that movie. Is there a way that i could watch it?

            Comment

            • RoyalFlush
              Contender
              Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
              • Mar 2010
              • 226
              • 255
              • 87
              • 6,966

              #26
              hi sup guys, i just made an account here in BS but i have been reading news and posts for the last 3 months. as a matter of fact, i was also here checking for updates during the may-pac negotiation. and please cut me some slack for my first post.

              as a boxing fan, i would love to watch that match and i believe that it falling apart was part of a grander scheme of things of making it an even bigger fight in the future. the money involve is just crazy for anyone to miss. anyhow, imho the lawsuit was just a publicity stunt in order to keep the "issue" floating and hyping it even more. if it was true, then we would have been hearing updates by now as to the progress of the case.

              Comment

              • pasawayako
                Undisputed Champion
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Dec 2009
                • 15348
                • 639
                • 194
                • 151,963

                #27
                Good move by team pac, go pac sue all of them......

                Comment

                • Jcsuper
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Aug 2005
                  • 2685
                  • 200
                  • 381
                  • 9,253

                  #28
                  Originally posted by P4P305
                  Who cares. Pacquiao is gonna win against Floyd Sr and Roger, but not Floyd Jr. Floyd never made any quotes of Pacquiao being on steroids. I wonder how they gonna prove that Floyd accused him.
                  agree with you.

                  Hey, you will think I'm ****** but I'm french and in all honestly I don't even know whats a trade-off ? can someone explain me

                  Comment

                  • check hook
                    Gay Pride
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Jan 2010
                    • 9361
                    • 379
                    • 137
                    • 16,005

                    #29
                    Originally posted by sapo#1
                    i heard filipinos are called gay latinos in california!!!! this just proves it!!! they are pushing for 75k haha what a wayste of time!!!


                    + punitive damages.....trust me all the money comes if they can establish a case for "punitive" damages.

                    Comment

                    • Carpe Diem
                      Seize the day
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Jan 2010
                      • 15986
                      • 1,219
                      • 981
                      • 44,413

                      #30
                      Originally posted by Jcsuper
                      agree with you.

                      Hey, you will think I'm ****** but I'm french and in all honestly I don't even know whats a trade-off ? can someone explain me
                      It's like you give something, and you get something else in return. In this case, Floyd would drop his drug demands, and Manny would drop his lawsuit against Floyd's dad and Uncle. Neither sides would get anything, but it's kind of a trade-off.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP