Even the boston examiner posted that dirrell was acting

Collapse
X
Collapse
  • Page of 2
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 template Next
  • peyk-peyk
    Banned
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Aug 2009
    • 9514
    • 5,060
    • 10,032
    • 38,001
    #11
    Originally posted by **US Power**
    You just look weak as **** having to post an examiner article. You can't find a legit source agreeing with you, so you post that ****. It makes your argument look weak, which it is anyways.
    Wow, take it easy ****. Calm down and please don’t mimic Dirrell’s Oscar-winning performance.

      Comment

      • Sweet Jesus
        Banned
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Dec 2009
        • 11512
        • 568
        • 332
        • 13,576
        #12
        Another EXAMINER article *******s?

          Comment

          • kedashy
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jan 2006
            • 1934
            • 61
            • 0
            • 8,958
            #13
            It goes to show u that dirrell has some true fans...

              Comment

              Previous 1 2 template Next
              Working...
              TOP

              Sign In

              Forgot password?

              Register

              Get in on the latest boxing conversations in our Forum and comment on articles.
              JOIN NOW