This is ******ed. Are there any non-biased posters on this ****ing site at all?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • -Huey-
    Toledo, Spain.
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Feb 2010
    • 7812
    • 653
    • 382
    • 14,803

    #11
    I'm not a biased poster. I'm fair but firm.

    Comment

    • S.G.
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • May 2008
      • 9412
      • 296
      • 635
      • 16,360

      #12
      it's insane. just when i thought nsb couldn't get any more classless i come on and find all this

      Comment

      • Left Banned Tua
        Banned
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Jan 2010
        • 8398
        • 205
        • 132
        • 9,734

        #13
        Originally posted by S.G.
        it's insane. just when i thought nsb couldn't get any more classless i come on and find all this
        i welcome it.

        better than pac/floyd , roid/ducking talk.

        Comment

        • vercingetorix3
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Dec 2007
          • 1581
          • 73
          • 152
          • 8,356

          #14
          Originally posted by Keyser Soze
          Just reading through the threads on the AA vs Dirrell fight, and it's so painfully clear that 95% of people posting have a bias and agenda. You can actually predict posts if you have any sort of poster knowledge. And what makes this even more ******ed is that it's now mostly a European vs American thing.

          The Europeans think Dirrell is a faking, drug-test dodging cheat.

          The Americans think AA is just the latest Euro bum to get schooled by an American, and that Dirrell was comfortably waltzing to a decision win.

          Pathetic.
          First off, green k for this.

          Secondly, yes, many members on this site are as predictable as yesterday's lottery numbers. I was amused at first, but now it's rather annoying.

          I thought Abraham would win by knockout, but Dirrell was outboxing him and should have been ahead on the scorecards. But Abraham was turning up the pressure and starting to get to Andre. A shame, too....

          Just imagine if a DQ like that happens during Pacquiao/Mayweather....

          Comment

          • B.U.R.N.E.R
            ~NSB Legend 2005-2015~
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Feb 2010
            • 30197
            • 1,346
            • 400
            • 47,475

            #15
            Yeah its pathetic............I actually AA and Dirrell but eh AA guys are acting classless.

            Comment

            • Grand Champ
              Banned
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Jul 2007
              • 12782
              • 968
              • 1,313
              • 23,079

              #16
              Originally posted by P.WILL
              I'm not biased but what Abraham did was obviously wrong and deserved the disqualification. I agree with your post though, people should be worrying about Dirrell's health not whether he's a good actor or not.
              Biased.

              Try again.

              Comment

              • ecko72jc
                Up and Comer
                • Mar 2010
                • 75
                • 1
                • 0
                • 6,123

                #17
                Originally posted by Grand Champ
                Biased.

                Try again.
                So Abraham didn't deserve the DQ? And the health of Andre isn't important?

                Comment

                • STEELHEAD
                  Banned
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Nov 2004
                  • 14730
                  • 537
                  • 478
                  • 27,196

                  #18
                  Originally posted by P.WILL
                  I'm not biased but what Abraham did was obviously wrong and deserved the disqualification. I agree with your post though, people should be worrying about Dirrell's health not whether he's a good actor or not.
                  and how bout the real travestry here.
                  peeps can't see the trees for the forest(or something like that).
                  the fkg slippery logos
                  it actualy may have changed the outcome of the fight!
                  but why not just sit back and go on flaming.
                  IDIOTS

                  Comment

                  • D-MiZe
                    Banned
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Mar 2009
                    • 25073
                    • 1,061
                    • 371
                    • 75,542

                    #19
                    I agree, blame the logos!

                    If it wasn't for that Rockstar logo in the Hatton-Pac fight, Hatton would have won.

                    Comment

                    • STEELHEAD
                      Banned
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Nov 2004
                      • 14730
                      • 537
                      • 478
                      • 27,196

                      #20
                      Originally posted by Šemise
                      I agree, blame the logos!

                      If it wasn't for that Rockstar logo in the Hatton-Pac fight, Hatton would have won.
                      are you as dim as you seem buttwipe!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP