People already forgetting the Mcclellan incident

[HandSpeed303]

i deleted it, changed my mind on what i posted

but i think this was worse than griffin-jones and all those others you posted
the mcclellan one being the only one i agree with as he was getting badly beaten over the head with rabbit punches

I can dig the honesty brotha!

Just to me, the fights I named seemed almost similar to what happened last night.

I do agree that the punch should not have happened, but it is not a drastic as many are making it out to be...Not in my view at least.

I hope Dirrel is ok, a builds on this victory. I haven't seen the whole fight yet, but I hear he was doing great (from my brother, not from this site)..

[Poet682006]

Yes, but remember many of the same people claiming that Dirrell is faking it have made the disgusting claim in the past that McClellan faked it as well

Poet

[HandSpeed303]

Exactly, that's the first thing I thought of. You don't have to be KOed cold for you to be effected by a punch.

That is true, but the G-Man situation is a 100 mile in the other direction compared to last night.

The G-man suffered rabbit punches for several rounds. Flush one's at that. It is a ton of difference IMO.

[boxasmash]

That is true, but the G-Man situation is a 100 mile in the other direction compared to last night.

The G-man suffered rabbit punches for several rounds. Flush one's at that. It is a ton of difference IMO.

I just think both McClellan and Dirrell faced murderous punchers, Dirrell got hit flush with his guard down so it's bound to have a serious effect.

[HandSpeed303]

Yes, but remember many of the same people claiming that Dirrell is faking it have made the disgusting claim in the past that McClellan faked it as well

Poet

I have never seem anyone say that....

If so, shame on them.

But through out my time on any boxing forum, I have yet to see that kind of statement...

[HandSpeed303]

I just think both McClellan and Dirrell faced murderous punchers, Dirrell got hit flush with his guard down so it's bound to have a serious effect.

I gotcha bro.

[K2ray]

a fighter doesn't have to fall face first into the canvas while ****eyed to be hurt

and usually squinting your eyes and putting your glove to your head(like mcclellan did) is not a good sign
luckily dirrell got up and did'nt stay passed out on the canvas to be taken out in a stretcher, people forget he took bombs from arthur like nothin up until that point were he got struck unexpectedly while down
and people got the nerve to call the man a coward and a *****
****in hell...


trying to win is one thing, but what arthur did was just ******
too much primitive machoness in him, he should try being more strategic and clear headed next time

I have never seem anyone say that....

If so, shame on them.

But through out my time on any boxing forum, I have yet to see that kind of statement...

Some British fans have made comments of this nature...plus there definition of a 'warrior' being somebody who goes head first into a collusion regardless of the consequences..even their own.

[#1Assassin]

I feel you, but really, I won't even go into that punch by AA.

I really don't think being rabbit punched all night (like what happened to the G-Man, and yes that happened) and having that one punch hit you (like I said i will not go into it, the punch looked weird though, like it could have hurt, or not) are comparable...

IMO, I thought what Roy did, and Soto looked far worst...Even Margo's late punch on Cotto.

okey then how about eubank-watson II? watson took one big shot and went down, got back up and even came out for the next round.

the mcclellan comparison wasnt about what did the damage anyways, it was about how a fighter can look okey one second and be hurt badly the next. the point is there is no reason to think dirrell was faking it, none whatsoever. he took a massive shot, there was a delayed reaction and then he went down badly hurt and unable to continue.

only a sad twisted individual would say dirrell faked it, he fought a brilliant fight no way he wanted to go out like that. who would fake being knocked out in front of their hometown crowd and family in a fight they already have in the bag? and yes the fight was in the bag, abraham was swinging wildly but dirrell was still too fast and skilled for him.

[sterling]

a fighter doesn't have to fall face first into the canvas while ****eyed to be hurt

and usually squinting your eyes and putting your glove to your head(like mcclellan did) is not a good sign
luckily dirrell got up and did'nt stay passed out on the canvas to be taken out in a stretcher, people forget he took bombs from arthur like nothin up until that point were he got struck unexpectedly while down
and people got the nerve to call the man a coward and a *****
****in hell...


trying to win is one thing, but what arthur did was just ******
too much primitive machoness in him, he should try being more strategic and clear headed next time

i completely agree

[HandSpeed303]

Some British fans have made comments of this nature...plus there definition of a 'warrior' being somebody who goes head first into a collusion regardless of the consequences..even their own.

Now I have seem ****** comments on the matter, I'm not saying that. I just haven't seem the one that Poet was talkin about. The people saying the Gerald was faking.

I have seem folk say the Benn never threw one single illegal blow in that fight...Oh I have seem some carzy stuff, just not that.