Comments Thread For: Dirrell Drops King Arthur To Win, Suffers Brutal Knockout

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • amayseng
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jul 2005
    • 2359
    • 134
    • 11
    • 8,801

    #171
    Originally posted by laughstock
    Direll did not win...That fight was bought by Direll. Ummmm wonder how much the referee was paid....He needs to man up and fight and stop falling "slipping" or start acting.
    you are a disgrace to the sport let alone this forum...

    go somewhere else and post, we wont tolerate such ridiculous nonsense...

    dirrel clearly won all rounds but 1 before the dq

    Comment

    • WESS
      Most Definitely
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Jan 2008
      • 13012
      • 977
      • 1,143
      • 20,219

      #172
      Originally posted by romebyko
      I think Froch is underated.He is going to prove some people wrong.His style is not the prettiest to watch but he come's to fight and is exciting.I feel he is goin to do better then people think.
      I don't. I think once he gets in the ring with a crafty and smart fighter he will be shown up. He's really not that good. But yes he has a come forward always ready to fight style.

      Any top guys in MW or SMW I think would beat Froch. He barley got passed a green Dirrell in his OWN back yard. What happens when he fights Bute, Pavlik, Martinez or even PWILL? Top guys that can **** that have technical skills. I say that loosely with Pav, he still needs some work.

      Even if crack head Joe Calzaghe bounced out of rehab and "fought"/slapped Froch around for 12 he would beat him. I like Froch's aggressive style and I like his ****y attitude. That's my style. Reason I like Jones jr, Tyson, Mayweather, Hammed. ****y but backed there **** up. Froch is nowhere near that.

      He hasn't fought anyone (yet). BUT I will say he's on a better path than crackhead Joe. Dude didn't do anything until the end of his career. HOF? Yes anything else? No... Froch has plenty of time to exceed crackheads "legacy". We know for one thing, he wont "duck" nobody. He comes to fight, doesn't look good but he does come to fight. But he wont win the super six by any means. Look to the "green" Americans to pull off the upset. Ward or Dirrell.
      Last edited by WESS; 03-28-2010, 06:02 PM.

      Comment

      • gman849
        Amateur
        Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
        • Nov 2006
        • 13
        • 2
        • 0
        • 6,796

        #173
        While I do not think AA would have knocked out Direll, what the hell does it matter. AA should have been DQed. AA clearly clocked Direll after he had clearly slipped. Why on earth should Direll have to continue after taking such a monsterous illegal blow? I agrre with you.

        Comment

        • Rome-By-Ko
          The winner Is
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Mar 2009
          • 20157
          • 323
          • 332
          • 29,833

          #174
          Originally posted by WESS
          I don't. I think once he gets in the ring with a crafty and smart fighter he will be shown up. He's really not that good. But yes he has a come forward always ready to fight style.

          Any top guys in MW or SMW I think would beat Froch. He barley got passed a green Dirrell in his OWN back yard. What happens when he fights Bute, Pavlik, Martinez or even PWILL? Top guys that can **** that have technical skills. I say that loosely with Pav, he still needs some work.

          Even if crack head Joe Calzaghe bounced out of rehab and "fought"/slapped Froch around for 12 he would beat him. I like Froch's aggressive style and I like his ****y attitude. That's my style. Reason I like Jones jr, Tyson, Mayweather, Hammed. ****y but backed there **** up. Froch is nowhere near that.

          He hasn't fought anyone (yet). BUT I will say he's on a better path than crackhead Joe. Dude didn't do anything until the end of his career. HOF? Yes anything else? No... Froch has plenty of time to exceed crackheads "legacy". We know for one thing, he wont "duck" nobody. He comes to fight, doesn't look good but he does come to fight. But he wont win the super six by any means. Look to the "green" Americans to pull off the upset. Ward or Dirrell.
          To be real I feel Froch beats Pav and bute Martinez will never fight him Maybe Pwill but I like Froch in that one as well.The super six his alot of good fighter's and as it's been proven anything can happen.One thing is for sure Froch is rough and will put you in a rough fight to win.IMHO Dirrell did not do enough to take a champion's belt when he fought Froch.I had it close but had Froch winning that fight.

          Comment

          • Chief2ndzOnly!
            Long Live Walt Liquor!!!!
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Feb 2010
            • 12629
            • 1,561
            • 1,396
            • 222,500

            #175
            Originally posted by amayseng
            you are a disgrace to the sport let alone this forum...

            go somewhere else and post, we wont tolerate such ridiculous nonsense...

            dirrel clearly won all rounds but 1 before the dq
            Thank you Amay. I had the fight the exact same way, and we do not need foolishness on the boards like the fella you replied to.

            Comment

            • Chief2ndzOnly!
              Long Live Walt Liquor!!!!
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Feb 2010
              • 12629
              • 1,561
              • 1,396
              • 222,500

              #176
              Originally posted by romebyko
              To be real I feel Froch beats Pav and bute Martinez will never fight him Maybe Pwill but I like Froch in that one as well.The super six his alot of good fighter's and as it's been proven anything can happen.One thing is for sure Froch is rough and will put you in a rough fight to win.IMHO Dirrell did not do enough to take a champion's belt when he fought Froch.I had it close but had Froch winning that fight.
              I'm gonna have to watch this fight again, but going back on my pad that I use to score all major fights; I had Dirrell 116/112 using the 10 point must system. The 10th round was anybody's round and I gave Froch rounds 3,7,8, and 10. I gave him nothing more than that. The actual scores for that fight were 115/112(2) for Froch and 114/113 for Dirrell. Dirrell had a point taken in the tenth for holding without being given a warning, so if you give him that point back it makes the fight even that much closer. I think that Dirrell outboxed Froch enough to take his strap.

              Comment

              • Dave Rado
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Dec 2008
                • 8064
                • 266
                • 453
                • 14,460

                #177
                Originally posted by harutfromnh
                Its not that he didnt agree with the decision, its that he was upset it ended up the way it did
                Well he said he disagreed with the decision, and apparently Sauerland are going to appeal the decision, and have also accused Dirrell of faking it, which is sick and disgusting.

                Comment

                • PittyPat
                  Kin yer taste the blood?!
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Jan 2009
                  • 11222
                  • 715
                  • 445
                  • 28,773

                  #178
                  Soooooo, Dirrell schools and exposes another one-dimensional European. This is getting hot!

                  Comment

                  • Dave Rado
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Dec 2008
                    • 8064
                    • 266
                    • 453
                    • 14,460

                    #179
                    Originally posted by romebyko
                    Why did'int Dirrell leave on a stretcher with that shaking kinda scary.
                    Gary Shaw has said that he'll never promote a fight in Michigan ever again because of the fact that they didn't take him out on a stretcher. He would have been taken out on a stretcher in any other state. He says it was because Michigan is inexperienced and unprofessional when it comes to holding big fights.

                    Comment

                    • Rome-By-Ko
                      The winner Is
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Mar 2009
                      • 20157
                      • 323
                      • 332
                      • 29,833

                      #180
                      Originally posted by Chief2ndzOnly!
                      I'm gonna have to watch this fight again, but going back on my pad that I use to score all major fights; I had Dirrell 116/112 using the 10 point must system. The 10th round was anybody's round and I gave Froch rounds 3,7,8, and 10. I gave him nothing more than that. The actual scores for that fight were 115/112(2) for Froch and 114/113 for Dirrell. Dirrell had a point taken in the tenth for holding without being given a warning, so if you give him that point back it makes the fight even that much closer. I think that Dirrell outboxed Froch enough to take his strap.
                      I have to say Dirrell did box AA ear's off.But, the Froch fight I did not feel was boxing it was avoiding... basicly running.I never feel like May's runs because... He Boxes.I never said Ward run's because he boxes.Dirrell runs try's his hardest not to exchange.I gave him some rd's but at the end of the day not enough to win the fight.But can't be mad if someone had it for Dirrell but not on my scorecard.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP