Can Tyson ever again become Undisputed Heavyweight Champion

[!! Mr. Soprano]

so what has bewster done to say Tyson cant compete with him, if u are sayin it because he KOed Golota in one then u are crazy, that means nothing, if it does then hey Tyson beat Ettinee in 49 secs and Brewster lost to him, it all means absolutley nothing, Tyson can compete with anyone in the division, he will prove it and every one will be back on the Tyson bandwagon after he wins another Title. I wanna see Tyson vs Sam Peter, So Tyson can put that bum to sleep,

No, what I'm saying is that Tyson runs out of gas and runs out of gas quick as his tank is nearly empty.

We know Brewster can take punishment.. (W. Klitchko)

So if Tyson doesn't take him down in the first 2 rounds (which is unlikely) Brewster wins!

[The Troll]

No, what I'm saying is that Tyson runs out of gas and runs out of gas quick as his tank is nearly empty.

We know Brewster can take punishment.. (W. Klitchko)

So if Tyson doesn't take him down in the first 2 rounds (which is unlikely) Brewster wins!

Tyson would destroy Brewster. Tyson can fight at any pace wants vs Brewster. And Tyson has been working on his pacing according to Fenech. And that is something Tyson needs to work on. Tyson has been sparring already 8 rounds in training. That is good for him. IF he comes in vs McBride weighing like 221 from all that sparring and running, he will be a force to be reckoned with. No way is Brewster or Byrd going to be able to defeat Tyson if he is in shape and focused. Tyson can fight at any pace he wants vs those two. Ruiz might be tough, but fighting with Tyson inside is a bad neighborhood and Ruiz has a bad chin. Vitali Klistchko can be hurt when you get inside on him and there is a scarcely a fighter better at working his way in landing shots than Tyson. If Tyson gets that quick inside uppercut cracking and that left jab cracking. He will be hard to stop. Tyson's uppercurts are sooooo devastating.

[guru]

the guys tyson cannot beat:
byrd, toney, vk, brewster, rahman... they're all too durable, too tough...

the guys tyson could possibly beat, but i'd still make him the underdog:
ruiz, wlad, donald, holy

the guys tyson would beat:
golota, fres, mccline, barrett


undisputed champ again???? hell NO

[The Troll]

the guys tyson cannot beat:
byrd, toney, vk, brewster, rahman... they're all too durable, too tough...

the guys tyson could possibly beat, but i'd still make him the underdog:
ruiz, wlad, donald, holy

the guys tyson would beat:
golota, fres, mccline, barrett


undisputed champ again???? hell NO

Rahman has a bad chin and would get knocked out. He was knocked out of the ring by Old Oleg Maskeav. Brewster has no skills in comparison to Tyson and the strategy of letting Tyson use his skull as cathers mit until he runs out stamina wont work with Tyson. Byrd has absolutely no deterrent to Tyson's offence and is not that durable really. Tyson would pound Toney mercifully to the body and give him his first career stoppage loss. Klistchko is the only opponent that can give a well conditioned focused and well paced Tyson problems. Dont forget that Vitali Klistchko has stamina problems of his own, however he negates it by his intelligent pacing and selection of punches.

[guru]

Rahman has a bad chin and would get knocked out. He was knocked out of the ring by Old Oleg Maskeav. Brewster has no skills in comparison to Tyson and the strategy of letting Tyson use his skull as cathers mit until he runs out stamina wont work with Tyson. Byrd has absolutely no deterrent to Tyson's offence and is not that durable really. Tyson would pound Toney mercifully to the body and give him his first career stoppage loss. Klistchko is the only opponent that can give a well conditioned focused and well paced Tyson problems. Dont forget that Vitali Klistchko has stamina problems of his own, however he negates it by his intelligent pacing and selection of punches.

rahman has been KO'd, but he's durable and can box when he has a 1 dimensional fighter like tyson in front of him, see his fights with tua.... byrd could box circles around tyson as would toney... VK stamina's problems are a myth til proven, he has several late round KO's...

Let's not forget we area talking about a 40 year old, inactive, injured tyson... he hasn't even beaten a DECENT opponent in years.. i dont see how he'll beat the contenders and champions of today... i'll admit that ruiz, rahman, byrd, toney, vk aren't the greatest crop of heavyweights, but to think that tyson at this stage of his career can beat all of them is crazy... tyson has done NOTHING to suggest that he can still compete with them...

[The Troll]

rahman has been KO'd, but he's durable and can box when he has a 1 dimensional fighter like tyson in front of him, see his fights with tua.... byrd could box circles around tyson as would toney... VK stamina's problems are a myth til proven, he has several late round KO's...

Let's not forget we area talking about a 40 year old, inactive, injured tyson... he hasn't even beaten a DECENT opponent in years.. i dont see how he'll beat the contenders and champions of today... i'll admit that ruiz, rahman, byrd, toney, vk aren't the greatest crop of heavyweights, but to think that tyson at this stage of his career can beat all of them is crazy... tyson has done NOTHING to suggest that he can still compete with them...

Tyson's handspeed is just as good as Byrd's and Byrd's skills are overrate. Byrd is just totally overrated in general sence. He lost to Andrew Golota quite clearly and he barely made it past Jameel McCline who just lost to Calvin Brock. But he is the boxrec numero uno Heavyweight for what it is worth. And Rahman's chin sucks. He been knocked out alot of times. And he lost to C caliber opponents and been knocked out by them like Maskaev.

I hate when people say like Frank Lotziero that Tyson has not beat a decent fighter since 1991 that is complete bull****. He beat Bruce Seldon for the WBA title in in 1995. He beat Frank Bruno for the WBC title in in 1995 or 1996.

I dont know how you dont count beating chapions like Bruno WBC and Seldon WBA (by early KO no less) as quality wins.

[guru]

bruce seldon is one of the worse champs of all time, look at his resume.. he never beaten a good fighter... he only became champ cause he signed with don king... what did he do to ever deserve the title??? nothing...

byrd having close fights with AG and JM, is still more than anything tyson has done in the few years... even if you think byrd lost those fights, it show he belongs in the same league as those guys... rahman has been KO'd, but he also shown some durablity... against sanders he got up off floor to win, tyson has never done that...

this isnt 1987.... its' 2005 and tyson was shut out against lewis unlike rahman... KO'd by williams.. and even struggle to beat botha... he's only fought 4 times in 5 years for just 20 rounds... 2 KO losses, 2 wins over eteinne and neilsen...

[The Troll]

bruce seldon is one of the worse champs of all time, look at his resume.. he never beaten a good fighter... he only became champ cause he signed with don king... what did he do to ever deserve the title??? nothing...

byrd having close fights with AG and JM, is still more than anything tyson has done in the few years... even if you think byrd lost those fights, it show he belongs in the same league as those guys... rahman has been KO'd, but he also shown some durablity... against sanders he got up off floor to win, tyson has never done that...

this isnt 1987.... its' 2005 and tyson was shut out against lewis unlike rahman... KO'd by williams.. and even struggle to beat botha... he's only fought 4 times in 5 years for just 20 rounds... 2 KO losses, 2 wins over eteinne and neilsen...

So what he was still champ. Bruno was champ. They were champs. If you beat a champ its a quality win. Look how hard it is get the belt out Ruiz hands. You think Bruce Seldon and Frank Bruno would have no chance againt Ruiz or Byrd or Brewster. I think Bruno could beat all 3 those guys.

[guru]

So what he was still champ. Bruno was champ. They were champs. If you beat a champ its a quality win. Look how hard it is get the belt out Ruiz hands. You think Bruce Seldon and Frank Bruno would have no chance againt Ruiz or Byrd or Brewster. I think Bruno could beat all 3 those guys.

ever hear of the term "paper champ"??? being a champ doesn't necessarily mean you're a great fighter or even a good one... king is able to buy rankings and title shots... look at what he did for golota, AG went from unranked to mandatory immediately after signing with king... even with all that aside, doesnt change the fact that bruce seldon NEVER beat anyone

[The Troll]

ever hear of the term "paper champ"??? being a champ doesn't necessarily mean you're a great fighter or even a good one... king is able to buy rankings and title shots... look at what he did for golota, AG went from unranked to mandatory immediately after signing with king... even with all that aside, doesnt change the fact that bruce seldon NEVER beat anyone

Golota was never the mandatory. Byrd took Golota as his optional title defence. He took McCline also I believe as his option title defence. For some reason the IBF have had no #1 contender (mandatory) ranked for some time.

And Like I said Bruno and Seldon are as good of champs as Brewster and Byrd and Ruiz and Tyson KO'd both of them early. And like said I think Bruno would beat Ruiz Byrd or Brewster. He was not that bad of champion. He only lost 3 times I believe and 2 of those times were to Tyson. The other time was to Lennox Lewis and all his wins were by KO with the exception 2. That is definitely a quality win.