How many slick African American fighters has May ought?

[jrosales13]

u can bring up spodafora and johnston and they were/are decent fighters but dont act like they deserved to fight floyd and dont act like they top contenders at 135 at the time. i mean johnston lost to lacanzo in 2003!!! why da hell did he deserve a shot at floyd. that makes no sense. either way u r reaching son and u kno it. there was no guy at 135 that stood a chance at beating floyd, slick or otherwise. if he decided to spend any more time picking off those losers he would have never gotten nowhere. he beat corrales he went on to beat castillo. the rest was just icing on the cake. we both kno that, no tardo.

They were not top contenders at the time? Not top contenders? Spadafora an undefeated title holder. Johnston got shafted both times against Castillo. Yet Johnston was not a top fighter at the time? Johnston who was roaming top 10 P4P at the time was just decent?

At the end of 2002/ beggining of 2003 Johnston was ranked #2 at 135 and Spadafoara at #3

http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/Th..._Ratings:_2002

So Spadafora and Johnston did not deserve a shot at Floyd in 2003 but Sosa and Ndou did? OK...

[Flawless Loc]

you consider campbell slick??

There is no definition for Slick. It seems to be conflicting views what slick is

If you don't consider Judah slick, I don't know who slick is

[jrosales13]

Flawles is an idiot, that is already known. So I am not surprised by him

But, it really is a shame that posters who I thought were knowledgable and unbiased are full of contradiction bull****. But, whatever makes them sleep at night.

[johncods]

There is no definition for Slick. It seems to be conflicting views what slick is

If you don't consider Judah slick, I don't know who slick is

I never said judah wasn't slick i said he ******. In your definition what do you mean by slick?? and is campbell one of them??

[PAKYO]

everyone on this thread is making up definitions of what they think slick is none of it matters because all of this is all bull**** tards are using to downplay what another fighter has achieved. whats sad is ppl i didnt think were tards are proving me wrong. there aint a boxer alive right now that can beat floyd at boxing. no one wants to see him fight another slick boxer yet we have ppl sayin hes ducking. wats wrong wit tht??? and now i bet u 4 weeks we'll have ppl brining this bull up in topics.

manny hasnt fought any real boxers slick or otherwise, unless u want to consider cotto one, which i rly dont. im not sure its his fault. i mean he could have fought campbell or bradley but rly who wanted to see tht nyways?? the only boxer he must fight right now is floyd and then we'll see the truth nyways so im content to wait.

What is sadder is that you are more ****** with what you just wrote i would love to frame it and hang it in my wall.

You said "there aint a boxer alive right now that can beat floyd at boxing", what if floyd gets beaten this May 1, are you going to commit suicide since you are so sure?

You said "manny hasnt fought any real boxers slick or otherwise"...i'm really wondering if you are using your brain or it is just not functioning at all. So Manny was just fighting fake boxers all along?

Please go back and try to absorb what you just wrote. If i was trolling like you are now, i would be ashamed to death for saying such moronic statements and comes off like i know something about boxing.

[Kagami Taiga]

What is sadder is that you are more ****** with what you just wrote i would love to frame it and hang it in my wall.

You said "there aint a boxer alive right now that can beat floyd at boxing", what if floyd gets beaten this May 1, are you going to commit suicide since you are so sure?

You said "manny hasnt fought any real boxers slick or otherwise"...i'm really wondering if you are using your brain or it is just not functioning at all. So Manny was just fighting fake boxers all along?

Please go back and try to absorb what you just wrote. If i was trolling like you are now, i would be ashamed to death for saying such moronic statements and comes off like i know something about boxing.

dude, ur not at all getting what i wrote, im not talking about boxers as in those who participate in the sport boxing. im talking about boxers who actually box, who move around the ring, who dont seek to trade with manny. the nate campbells, the floyd mayweathers, the tim bradleys...i was trying not to use the word slick but it came off otherwise. i wasnt at all tryna troll. if u were in the thread earlier u would be able to keep up.

[Kagami Taiga]

and when i say manny hasnt fought a real boxer(as opposed to an infighter/brawler type) i mean he hasnt fought one since he moved up. be4 moving up he had wins over jmm and morales, two very skilled boxers. but since then he just hasnt fought any one whos very skilled at boxing, unless u consider cotto a true boxer, which i dont really.

[PAKYO]

and when i say manny hasnt fought a real boxer(as opposed to an infighter/brawler type) i mean he hasnt fought one since he moved up. be4 moving up he had wins over jmm and morales, two very skilled boxers. but since then he just hasnt fought any one whos very skilled at boxing, unless u consider cotto a true boxer, which i dont really.

For me, anyone who dons a glove and gets licensed as a professional boxer is A boxer. They're always called A BOXER. Nothing else.

Don't ever attempt to define which one is a true boxer or not as you'll just get shot down as soon as you attempt to takeoff.

[Kagami Taiga]

For me, anyone who dons a glove and gets licensed as a professional boxer is A boxer. They're always called A BOXER. Nothing else.

Don't ever attempt to define which one is a true boxer or not as you'll just get shot down as soon as you attempt to takeoff.

son, are u paying attention??i think u need to take ur ****** cap off n listen. re read what i wrong. im not trying to define a true boxer. im discerning the difference between a boxer type and a fighter, as in styles. if u cant understand that, plz dont comment on my post again. ur being annoying, i explained to u what i meant and ur still actin like u dont understand. get over urself.

[PAKYO]

son, are u paying attention??i think u need to take ur ****** cap off n listen. re read what i wrong. im not trying to define a true boxer. im discerning the difference between a boxer type and a fighter, as in styles. if u cant understand that, plz dont comment on my post again. ur being annoying, i explained to u what i meant and ur still actin like u dont understand. get over urself.

I'm just trying to expose your hypocrisy vis-a-vis this discussion. If your getting annoyed with me then plain ignore my post and don't read it.

I re-read what you've written and it is still the same thing, nothing has changed. I also understand what you're trying to say now which is very different to what you were previously stating. So reread first before hitting the submit button.

Don't call me son though, i might be a day older than you...