Manny Still hasn't fought any slick fighters!

[Fox McCloud]

Do certain fans on here get their fact straight before trashing Floyd Mayweather.......absolutely not!!!

The question is fair game IMO........

Certain people on the Pacquiao side being ignorant justifies an ignorant ass thread asking a question that is already answered in the first post?

It's not a fair question, because this thread isn't a question. Questions that are paired with answers off the bat are not intended for the TS to learn anything... merely to get his point across.

[-The Glove-]

Slick doesn't equate to good, worthy competition.

[check hook]

slick= no punching ass running bitches..........

serious question: how can you run in a 20 foot ring??

No fighter can run if the opponent knows how to cut off the ring.

Iv'e seen fighters use lateral movement and footwork to get out of the way of punches.......but i don't think iv'e ever seen a fighter run........perhaps you could enlighten me....?

[The Hate Giver]

I don't know what you are getting at with this:

"but wait victoriano sosa, philip ndou, & agapito sanchez ARE NOT AMERICAN BLACK SLICK!!!!!!"

I mean, you may be calling out someone, but it's certainly not me. I have never said that black Americans are the only slick fighters. That is nonsense.

Who is slicker between Barrera and Hernandez depends on which Barrera fight you are watching. Hernandez was pretty slick though.

I've never seen Agapito Sanchez actually. All I know about him is that he is dirty as hell. I've heard that from every single person who has mentioned him.

You know exactly what im getting at. Its the same argument these *****s & pac haters use when they start that pac hasnt fought any black american fighters.

You dont remember the boxingscene article that caused an uproar written by brent matteo anderson?

He claims pac has never fought any slick black figthers & has ducked slick black american fighters but his whole article was based on pac ducking guzman. somebody who is not american. Not only that but pedro fernandez from ringtalk always crapped on pac for not fighting slick black fighters.

but everybody forgets in 3 straight fights pac fought lehnolo ledwaba, agapito sanchez, & jorge julio eliecer. Three fighters who could be called slick if you wanna call genaro, ndou, sosa slick.

[Khalid X]

Again.....

Manny won his first world title against a slick fighter in Sasakul. Sasakul was the top guy at 112 so there was no cherry picking involved.

Also I find it idiotic for the article writer to say Pac has carefully selected his opponents. Reason why is that

112-Sasakul was the top guy there at the time. (Johnson had moved up prior to this fight happening, making this fight the fight for top guy at 112)

122-Ledbawa was the top guy at that class when Pac beat him

126-Barrera was the clear #1 guy at FW when Pac beat him

135-Diaz top 3 LW...Pac would have more than likely stayed and fought Campbell, but ODH came calling and you don't turn down an Oscar fight.

140-Ricky Hatton was the top guy there

147- Cotto and Clottey were top 5 WW


So seeing that Pac has consistently beaten the #1 guy in each division he has been in outside of 135, How the hell has he carefully selected his opponents? I get mad because I hate how people try to force bull**** on the masses by trying to change history to fit an agenda.

[johncods]

Slick doesn't equate to good, worthy competition.

This.......

[baracuda]

[QUOTE=check hook;7895296]serious question: how can you run in a 20 foot ring??

QUOTE]

by imitating dirrel, floyd , gainer, etc...........

[tdubb]

What does everyone else think?? Have Roach and Arum blatantly been avoiding bad style matchups??


Manny Pacquiao Still Hasn’t Fought Any Slick Fighters

Thursday, March 25, 2010

By Jamal ****y


Many boxing fans were impressed with Manny Pacquiao’s one-sided victory over the immobile Joshua Clottey. Pacman is a fireball and he is extremely well conditioned but his style is so flawed that any slick fighter can exploit him easily. Juan Manuel Marquez showed how easy it is to pick Manny Pacquiao apart.

The writers name is "Jamal"..... another ***** next!!!

[check hook]

Again.....

Manny won his first world title against a slick fighter in Sasakul. Sasakul was the top guy at 112 so there was no cherry picking involved.

Also I find it idiotic for the article writer to say Pac has carefully selected his opponents. Reason why is that

112-Sasakul was the top guy there at the time. (Johnson had moved up prior to this fight happening, making this fight the fight for top guy at 112)

122-Ledbawa was the top guy at that class when Pac beat him

126-Barrera was the clear #1 guy at FW when Pac beat him

135-Diaz top 3 LW...Pac would have more than likely stayed and fought Campbell, but ODH came calling and you don't turn down an Oscar fight.

140-Ricky Hatton was the top guy there

147- Cotto and Clottey were top 5 WW


So seeing that Pac has consistently beaten the #1 guy in each division he has been in outside of 135, How the hell has he carefully selected his opponents? I get mad because I hate how people try to force bull**** on the masses by trying to change history to fit an agenda.

Hasn't Floyd consistently beaten the number 1 fighter in all of his division jumps????

[badboypeenoy]

Give me a "slick" black boxer who's either ranked around the same level P4P as Barrera, Morales Marquez, Hatton and Cotto when Pacquiao fought them. Someone who has almost the same rabid PPV paying and venue-packing fanbase, and who would be in and around the same weightclass as Pacquiao.