Stop Bringing up the Past with the Klitsh

[Earl-Hickey]

how are we idiots............... cause im explaining something that has irritated me for years, and it seems like it only used against the Klits.........

It's used for any fighter that someone doesn't like, get used to it.

and saying that losing as a 16 year old kid to a grown man is no excuse. Disgraceful.

[boxingking500]

It's used for any fighter that someone doesn't like, get used to it.

and saying that losing as a 16 year old kid to a grown man is no excuse. Disgraceful.

its not just the fighters they lose to... its fighters from the 80s and 90s and stuff.....

i mean its like this- Klit knocks out chambers

someone starts a thread- Tyson would KTFO Wlad, Wlad is horrible etc.

ok so what tyson wins, does that make wlad a bad fighter......... its a silly argument........................

i hate haye, for many reasons... i dont go out and say he will get Destroyed by Tyson............ its just really a pathetic thing to say

[bojangles1987]

everywhere i go, no matter how the klit brothers do, there is always hate, and everybody brings up the past like wlad's lost to Ross Purity, or Brewster... thats so ******, a really silly argument....

or when people bring up stuff like "oh well Tyson would knock out wlad, or ali would destroy the klits" stop its the ******est argument ever

you klit-haters have no reasonble arguments against the klits, so you bring past fighters, to make yourself feel good........

When people say incredibly moronic things such as "either Klitschko would dominate and KO Ali" we bring up the fact that neither brother has beaten a great fighter, and have losses to less than stellar competition, because it's the truth.

[Earl-Hickey]

its not just the fighters they lose to... its fighters from the 80s and 90s and stuff.....

i mean its like this- Klit knocks out chambers

someone starts a thread- Tyson would KTFO Wlad, Wlad is horrible etc.

ok so what tyson wins, does that make wlad a bad fighter......... its a silly argument........................

i hate haye, for many reasons... i dont go out and say he will get Destroyed by Tyson............ its just really a pathetic thing to say

I agree with you there, but most of the other Klitschko fans do say things like that.

regardless it's something that will never change, it's been that way for years now.

[Guest]

I always had a soft spot for chinny British punchers (Hide, Bruno, Georgie Smith (lol))

I do however think Wlad is gonna do a Vit on Herbie Hide kind of beat down on Haye.

I just can't seem dealing with that massive right hand nor the relentless jabs.


If Haye was a southpaw I'd give him a better shot because of his speed, but as soon as he's in the line of fire, he's going to crumble.

[boxingking500]

When people say incredibly moronic things such as "either Klitschko would dominate and KO Ali" we bring up the fact that neither brother has beaten a great fighter, and have losses to less than stellar competition, because it's the truth.

you dont get what i am saying, im saying as when people use it as an argument on why they think the klits suck, or there terrible boxers, thats the point of this thread...

i dont get into all this "hypothetical" past vs. present fighting BS...... its all opinion.........................

[Earl-Hickey]

you dont get what i am saying, im saying as when people use it as an argument on why they think the klits suck, or there terrible boxers, thats the point of this thread...

i dont get into all this "hypothetical" past vs. present fighting BS...... its all opinion.........................

There is a section of the forum for fantasy fights, but most 'tards round here don't know it exists.

[ny123]

you dont get what i am saying, im saying as when people use it as an argument on why they think the klits suck, or there terrible boxers, thats the point of this thread...

i dont get into all this "hypothetical" past vs. present fighting BS...... its all opinion.........................

yeah i get your point but who gives a **** about those people who refuse to give credit to a certain fighter they dislike no matter what they accomplish. fantasy fights is another thing when a fighter reaches the top level you will have to expect people to start to compare them to the fighters of the past especially when the current comp isnt exactly top notch. my point is that when we are discussing wlad we cant ignore the past kos cuz they show wlads weakness and when discussing matchups we always discuss both fighters strengths and weaknesses

[boxingking500]

im all comparing strengths and weaknesses and past fighters, but not using past fighters as arguments for why you think a fighter sucks..........

[EuropeFightFan]

The Klitschkos have more than made up for their losses in my opinion...the old arguments about their past losses just seem ever more petty as time goes by to be honest. They are at the top because they are the best heavyweights of this era...yet even some people fail to give the Klitschkos their due credit. People in such a long term denial cannot call themselves true and honest fans of the sport...you've got to at least show some respect to these athletes for their courage, hard work and strong will. The Mayweathers of this world may make the big money, but too many professional boxers get ripped off by promoters, TV companies, etc and get a pittance compared to athletes in other sports...and look at the health risks they put themselves under just for one shot at glory. I wonder how many of these self styled 'internet macho men' on here would still be standing after a round with Ross Puritty? A boxer with 31 pro wins (regardless of the opposition), 27 of them knockouts and the former WBC International Heavyweight champion in his own right...just my two cents.