Better Win: Corrales or 38 Yr Old Mosley?

[koboy]

Shouldn't it matter, how he beats Mosley? Of course, that's if he beats Mosley. How could you answer this now?

[adobostreak]

"who? shane mosley with 5 losses?"

[Sweet Jesus]

In May in Mexico

Might as well be Sodom or Gomorrah.

[Ravishing]

Mosley by far. Forget the age factor because I think Mosley's proven he's still at the top of his game.

Though he's not in his prime anymore, not being in your prime doesn't equate to being completely shot (which some people can't seem to figure out on this site). Mosley presents a lot more problems than Corrales ever could when talking speed, power, and championship experience.

[The Hate Giver]

if the polls says that a mosley win is better than a corrales win, then how great of a fighter resume wise is floyd if his best win comes against a 39 year old who has been inactive for a 1 year & 6 months?

[-EX-]

Corrales was not mentally prime when Floyd fought him. He was fresh out of jail, unfocused and poorly trained.

Shane is a better win. I didn't vote for Castillo because I think he beat Floyd.

Floyd beat him the second time for sure...

And no excuses for Chico...

[-EX-]

I wonder how ppl feel know...especially the way Floyd beat Shane...

[Doctor_Tenma]

I wonder how ppl feel know...especially the way Floyd beat Shane...

Still feel the same, Corrales win was the better win. I know few agree with me.