Best post I have ever seen on Pac-Floyd. Read this PM I got.

[The Hate Giver]

If you read the Message you will clearly see he posts on NSB and said I can quote him. He might pop up in the thread but hes a poster here.

ok then why dont you quote him? why did you make it seem like a elaborate staged hoax about wow an anonymous poster sent me this floyd fan propaganda preamble. who sent it to you? what is his boxingscene name? why go through all the an anonymous poster sent me this?

just seems like the biased opinion of a floyd fan. nothing more.

pretty much. it just a long winded drivel about how great floyd is & how overrated pac is. its a long convoluted biased gibberish by a butthurt floyd hack.

[chinoy]

He is a ***** for sure....nothing more...nothing less....no big deal

[bayareamike]

"And a lot of people will shed tears that are bitter for them but sweet tasting for those who nauseated at the propagandist activism and saw Pac's fall coming"

is that the feeling you mayweather fans are feeling right now because Floyd isn't pacquiao? Lol. It's not pacquiaos fault Floyd isn't the face of boxing. He couldve been though. The only bitter ones are you froid stans that wanna downplay manny. I'm not speaking out of spite.

[Hi-Dro]

I thought this was going to be an objective article, which would speak of Pac, and Floyd, but it instead it was an article hating on Pac, and riding Floyd's nuts.

[Kagami Taiga]

I thought this was going to be an objective article, which would speak of Pac, and Floyd, but it instead it was an article hating on Pac, and riding Floyd's nuts.

interesting read, if not a little over the top. but i agree with you. why cant ppl ust call it as it is. taken as a whole floyd and manny are by far the top two figures in the sport of boxing. everyone else is under by some distance. that's why they need to fight and the fact is no one can be even 70% certain who wins that fight, both have advantages and disadvantages.

[imscythe]

No Ceilings thread and his first post is a best post if you live your entire day hating on pac and he agrees with it because he fits best in that criteria.

[led]

best read?????

NO CEILINGS IS LAUGHABLE!!!!!!!!!!

read and reread, how balanced the article is.

[jpunieves]

so who the hell sent you the damn long post you just made?

i guess.... "from a reliable insider source"

[ThunderWolf]

A lot of people voted wrongly against Pacquiao when he was up against Barrera, Morales, Marquez, dela Hoya, Hatton and Cotto.

Against Mayweather, it will be an ultimate wrong choice that will be made, as usual. History repeats itself in extreme ways. Some people will never learn, opting to lose money all the time.

And one day, even Margarito will be considered as no match against the Pacman, as did Clottey and the rest, as opposed to opinions when he, Manny, was still a flyweight.

[Filipino Floyd]

A long but decent read. It's clearly a Mayweather hype but disguised with the occasional props to Pacquiao. I find it kind of hard to take the writer seriously when he states that the judges always score for the more active fighter than the effective fighter. Is it really that hard to believe, when a guy is throwing over a 100 punches a round compared to the 20-30 being thrown by the other guy? The 100 punches are not love taps either, it called overwhelming your opponent with offense to keep him on his defense. If you look at connect percentage, Pacquiao can throw 100 and land 30 of those punches. That's a 30% connect percentage. Clottey can throw 10 and land 5, giving him a 50% connect percentage. So, Clottey should have won based on the higher percentage? Suurrrreee.......