Those of you who believe Pacquiao is using PEDs please enter...

[ajohnz]

I posted this in another thread, but is is also suited for this one.

First of all there was no mention of this from your so called credible sources ever, prior to the Mayweathers. So the following applies to them also.

Truth is, not one single person on the planet aside from the Mayweather Wannabe Mafia had accused Manny of being on any PEDS prior to the Manny/ Floyd negotiations. No fan threads out there making these accusations. Not one mention.

The reason is simple: You're followers. You need someone else to do the thinking for you, make decisions for you, give you an opinion cause you are unable to form your own. This is very common amongst many people, "Weak People". I feel for you, you're part of the senseless herd that cannot think for themselves.

Followers, you will never lead.

wrong. i never believed the mayweathers when they accused pacquiao of taking PEDs. i did however, think for myself, and find it su****ious that manny would not agree to take the blood tests.

[Thread Stealer]

sorry man, but kobe wasnt great in highschool go and look into it

Someone who isn't a great HS player doesn't win the High School Player of the Year award, and then go straight into the NBA and get selected in the first round.

[Double Jab]

Is this just a bait thread so you can get all the *******s to come in here and talk ****?

I don't believe he uses them but I do have reasons for questioning him.

You have 30+ pages of this



Yes, this was a bait thread.

Doesn't change the fact arguing on the internet is fun!

[STREET CLEANER]

What non-sense is this "innocent till proven guilty" , this is not a criminal trial. Even on a civil court its prepondereance of evidence. What Pac is facing is the Court of Public Opinion. Some are positive and some are negative cause some events that have occured that raises su****ions.

[ajohnz]

I see....I was trying to put them together to make a point...

10. Donot covet thy neigbors wife, pertains to property which wives were concidered...

7. Donot commit adultery... In the traditional interpretation, adultery means having sex with another mans wife and pertains to property issues not a sense of "cheating" on your wife or girfriend....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ten_Commandments


Do You see where Im getting at???

yes, i see what you're getting at. however, your logic is incorrect. first, here is the definition for adultery...


–noun,plural-ter·ies.
"voluntary sexual intercourse between a married person and someone other than his or her lawful spouse."

now, adultery has always meant having sexual relations with someone who is not your spouse. i'm not sure who told you otherwise but they lied.

[dakoNYCaso]

yes, i see what you're getting at. however, your logic is incorrect. first, here is the definition for adultery...


–noun,plural-ter·ies.
"voluntary sexual intercourse between a married person and someone other than his or her lawful spouse."

now, adultery has always meant having sexual relations with someone who is not your spouse. i'm not sure who told you otherwise but they lied.

I understand what adultery means..... But, this is not the arguement...

We were talking about the biblical sense of adultery as pertaining to the relatively new translation of "cheating" when in the context of the Bible clearly shows adultery having to do with property......

I was speaking of the Ten Commandments not meanings in the dictionary....

[Double Jab]

I understand what adultery means..... But, this is not the arguement...

We were talking about the biblical sense of adultery as pertaining to the relatively new translation of "cheating" when in the context of the Bible clearly shows adultery having to do with property......

I was speaking of the Ten Commandments not meanings in the dictionary....

I think we all can agree that the Bible looks down on steroid use.

[big_james10]

Provide proof of Pacquiaos use of PEDs...

Don't say "Not taking the test for a $40,000,000,000,000,000 pay day"

That's not proof, that's you assuming...

Don't worry I'll wait...

Why don't you provide us with proof that he is NOT using PEDs? Simply because he says he's not and Bob Arum says he not and Ariza says he's not, DOES NOT MEAN THAT HE IS NOT USING PEDs. So prove to us that he is not instead of just assuming he is not using.

[the gent]

Having to test for dope at a job and not complying, well you have a point, although, this job that your testing for already had those doping test requirements instilled. So, if the NSAC had this rule "Floyd wants" implemented as a requirement, then yes he should test, but they do not. They already have their doping test requirements, Manny and all other fighters agree to take and have taken. Not once has there been a red flag that Manny was dirty.
Does this help with your dilemma as to how it is so hard to understand why he won't take any test from an outside source that has nothing to do with professional boxing.

[the gent]

how can these pacquiao fans not see this?

wrong. i never believed the mayweathers when they accused pacquiao of taking PEDs. i did however, think for myself, and find it su****ious that manny would not agree to take the blood tests.

well again. He did agree to take all test required of him by the NSAC. Did not agree to Floyds demands to do it his way. Easy enough to understand right.