This question is for those who claim and assume they now when a fighter is in his prime.
The perfect example is Miguel Cotto.
In a lil bit over 2 years he faces 7 guys. Out of those 7 guys, 5 are considered world class fighters , who were at the moment former , and some are at this point , champions.
It begins with an impressive win over Zab Judah. Continues with an even more impressive win over future HOF Shane Mosley where he completely outboxes him. A tune up fight with Alfonso Gomez. In 13 months
Then his first loss come to the hands (some say bricks) of Margarito. Which even if he didnt have plaster , it was already a hard fight to begin with.Then he comes back to take a vacant title against Jennings(too easy). Clottey , some say the judges robbed him I'd like to believe Cotto robbed him. And then Paquiao.
Ok so lets break it down.
In 13 months , he fought Zab , Mosley , and that bum Gomez.
Was he is his "Primer". I hope so. Before that nobody can make a claim he was or he wasnt. So withing those 10 months , we can agree , it was the first sign of him , Being at an elite level.
His first loss arrives. And from there on , including Margarito. he fights Jennings , Which was too easy , Clottey which makes every fighter struggle.
And the Manny Pacquiao( I dont need any comments for this one)
So between Zab and Marg. it was 13 months. And from Marg to Pacquiao , approx. 16 months. And after Marg the claims that he was past his prime begins.
So I'm guessing for those bright minds , The answer is 13 months. So after 13 months , the guy grabs his first loss. Where the guy received and handed his share of punishment , and the pressure combined with the punishment seems to be too much so he quits.
Is that it , is he past his prime. Was he at his prime for only 3 fights. Doesnt Pacquiao have 5 losses. Hanst he improved since then. Doesnt Hopkins have 5 losses. How about Mosley , doesnt he have 5 losses. Pacquiao didnt lose to the p4p king. Neither did Hopkins. How bout Mosley??
So when u reach ur prime , u are automatically have to beat the best?? Cuz of course u are in ur prime. There is no chance that the guy , after reaching the top , will lose to a top fighter.
Its just too ****ing hilarious reading some of the post of people claiming that a fighter is past his prime , or that he is shot. I mean , after seeing Cotto take one clear round , and Maybe a couple of others that were competitive , and seeing Clottey look like he did, There is no question in my mind , Cotto has more than enough to give Mayweather hell. Berto a beating , Mosley a competitive rematch.
So what is ur definition of prime , how long does it last.
The perfect example is Miguel Cotto.
In a lil bit over 2 years he faces 7 guys. Out of those 7 guys, 5 are considered world class fighters , who were at the moment former , and some are at this point , champions.
It begins with an impressive win over Zab Judah. Continues with an even more impressive win over future HOF Shane Mosley where he completely outboxes him. A tune up fight with Alfonso Gomez. In 13 months
Then his first loss come to the hands (some say bricks) of Margarito. Which even if he didnt have plaster , it was already a hard fight to begin with.Then he comes back to take a vacant title against Jennings(too easy). Clottey , some say the judges robbed him I'd like to believe Cotto robbed him. And then Paquiao.
Ok so lets break it down.
In 13 months , he fought Zab , Mosley , and that bum Gomez.
Was he is his "Primer". I hope so. Before that nobody can make a claim he was or he wasnt. So withing those 10 months , we can agree , it was the first sign of him , Being at an elite level.
His first loss arrives. And from there on , including Margarito. he fights Jennings , Which was too easy , Clottey which makes every fighter struggle.
And the Manny Pacquiao( I dont need any comments for this one)
So between Zab and Marg. it was 13 months. And from Marg to Pacquiao , approx. 16 months. And after Marg the claims that he was past his prime begins.
So I'm guessing for those bright minds , The answer is 13 months. So after 13 months , the guy grabs his first loss. Where the guy received and handed his share of punishment , and the pressure combined with the punishment seems to be too much so he quits.
Is that it , is he past his prime. Was he at his prime for only 3 fights. Doesnt Pacquiao have 5 losses. Hanst he improved since then. Doesnt Hopkins have 5 losses. How about Mosley , doesnt he have 5 losses. Pacquiao didnt lose to the p4p king. Neither did Hopkins. How bout Mosley??
So when u reach ur prime , u are automatically have to beat the best?? Cuz of course u are in ur prime. There is no chance that the guy , after reaching the top , will lose to a top fighter.
Its just too ****ing hilarious reading some of the post of people claiming that a fighter is past his prime , or that he is shot. I mean , after seeing Cotto take one clear round , and Maybe a couple of others that were competitive , and seeing Clottey look like he did, There is no question in my mind , Cotto has more than enough to give Mayweather hell. Berto a beating , Mosley a competitive rematch.
So what is ur definition of prime , how long does it last.
Comment