My only concern is Floyd's workrate. Manny may just throw so much, he'll take a decision. Manny is EASY to hit, Floyd will hit him-but will he THROW enough to beat him.
Manny has got every right to trash talk now, its not even about who your riding with on this one now. Floyd blatently is scared or something, there was no reason for him not to fight, the drug test was just embarassing.
PACQUIAO would probably knock his ass out in 2 or 3 rounds.
MOSLEY is lot thougher then FRAUD JR.
PACQUIAO vs MOSLEY will be great fight.
I also believe Mosley will give Pac a hard fight because not only Mosley could take punches but could counter punch. And Mosley has his own solid blows that could knock out Pac. Such fight will depend on each ability to absorb punches, imho. This is pretty much similar to Pac vs Morales fight.
OTOH, a Pac vs Floyd fight seems more interesting to see because of the big difference in style.
thing is, he dont need to PROVE **** to floyd, thats the point. he aint gotta do ****. floyd agreed on the 144 lb catchweight came in 2 lbs heavier paying 600k, pretty much sayin " **** you and your rules ill pay the fee" to marquez, thats why their 10 mil penalty is justifiable, floyd pretty much spit on that marquez contract. for floyds demands he has no proof whatsoever, only allegations his dope headed daddy made and he took it and ran with it to botch the fight.
manny gave in a little bit to the testing as it is, 24 days. did he even have to do that? not at all. theres a commision thts regulates rules already and he agreed to do more. floyds pushing it with his demands simple as that, you *****s fail to realize it cause you floyd fans think you ARE floyd. lol haha all of floyds fans tryin to BE floyd. no. stop.
You fan boys are so ignorant and biased it's funny. Every professional athlete is under su****ion for using PEDs. That's why pro sports such as boxing have drug testing policies in the 1st place. If you needed proof just to justify testing an athlete, then no athletes would eve be tested. The "there's no proof" argument is just beyond ******. You could use that same dumb*ss argument to justify Pacquiao not agreeing to urine testing. Anybody with a brain knows that there are ways around the current drug testing policy in boxing, so why would you claim that Mayweather needs proof to to justify his request for more stringent drug testing? The fact that it's possible that Pacquiao is doing things to beat the current drug testing policy is justification for Mayweather's request. Let's not forget that Mayweather would be subjected to the exact same testing that Pacquiao would be subjected to. This is a fact of the matter that you Pacquiao fanatics choose to ignore.
It's funny how you simpletons excuse Pacquiao's outrageous weight penalty request, but act as if Mayweather is out of line for making his own special request. That just shows how irrational and biased you people are. Both Mayweather and Pacquiao made requests that aren't standard, the difference is Mayweather agreed to Pacquiao's demands while Pacquiao walked away from the fight because of Mayweather's one demand. Mayweather even compromised on his one demand. Plus you have to look at all the lies and double-talk that came from Pacquiao's camp during the negotiation process. This is also something that you Pacquiao groupies refuse to acknowledge. When you add everytthin up, the answer is Pacquiao is the reason that the fight didn't happen. I believe that even had Mayweather agreed to the 24-day cutoff Paciuiao's camp would have came up with another reason not to take the fight. I have absolutely no reason to believe anything that Roach, Arum and company say.
how is fighting the best defensive fighter in history going to be easier than a walking heavybag that doesnt throwe back? i would love to know the asnwer to that 1!
how is fighting the best defensive fighter in history going to be easier than a walking heavybag that doesnt throwe back? i would love to know the asnwer to that 1!
Logic and common sense aren't too popular around here.
Comment