Originally posted by 1toTHADOME
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Mayweather: Pacquiao Got Exposed as One-Dimensional
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by TROUBLESUM81 View PostWHAT!!! EXACTLY WHAT MONEY SAID ABOUT PAC IS TRUE..... PAC HAS NO DEFENSE.... HE THREW OVER 1000 PUNCHES! WOW! BUT HE DID NOT EVEN LAND 25% OF THEM. PAC COULD NOT GET PASSED CLOTTEY D! AND YOU THINK HE HIS GOING TO GET PASSED MAYWEATHERS D! NOT ONLY THAT CLOTTEY IS NOT A VERY GOOD COUNTER PUNCHER! AND YET HE MANANGED TO TAG UP PAC FACE! MAYWEATHER ON THE OTHER HAND IS ABOUT THE GREATEST IN COUNTER PUNCHING..... OH ONE MORE THING, SOUNDS LIKE ROACH HAS MORE BALLS THEN PAC DOES!
Comment
-
floyd is not as exciting as pac everyone knows this but i also enjoy his style just like i enjoy pac's style....but i am sure that his fight with shane will be alot better than the fight pac just had this is a fact ....also pac's face was busted up against clottey although clottey only thru like 10 punches the whole fight what he did throw all landed flush...cotto also tagged him plenty, floyd will expose this he is a defensive genius and a very good counter puncher...
Comment
-
Originally posted by Measy1749 View Postlol, dude, its fake. look at the source. its a mma site. it's fake. y da hell would floyd do an interview with some random mma site???come on ppl...dont be son dense. the guy gets tv time on espn, he can interview with any sports magazine but yet he interviews with cage report and they dont even put any circumstances behind it. thats bad journalism and the interview reeks of fakeness. now if it was cited to another source, it may have been believable, but not from that one.
Comment
-
Comment
-
-
-
-
Originally posted by Measy1749 View Postlol, dude, its fake. look at the source. its a mma site. it's fake. y da hell would floyd do an interview with some random mma site???come on ppl...dont be son dense. the guy gets tv time on espn, he can interview with any sports magazine but yet he interviews with cage report and they dont even put any circumstances behind it. thats bad journalism and the interview reeks of fakeness. now if it was cited to another source, it may have been believable, but not from that one.
Comment
Comment