LOL. I love the way you look at things. His asking for 142 when Shane initially said 143 says it all. Please note a month later he asked for 143 against Cotto...then relented to 145. He had no intentions of fighting him and I give him no credit for avoiding him.
Would you give credit or not assuming the fight happened @142?
On June 4th is the article I posted - after Pacquiao vanquished Hatton and before Cotto faced Clottey.
Mine was dated May 1.
I guess sometime after Oscar/Pacquiao fight is when Shane approached Roach. I do believe Pac would've fought Shane albeit a drained one if you don't factor in Arum.
LOL ok! You're bashing Pac for choosing Cotto over Shane yet you wont give him credit if it does happen. i think i wont be able to get a sensible response. im done with you.
I guess sometime after Oscar/Pacquiao fight is when Shane approached Roach. I do believe Pac would've fought Shane albeit a drained one if you don't factor in Arum.
I know when yours was dated. Obviously they had no intention of fighting Shane.
LOL ok! You're bashing Pac for choosing Cotto over Shane yet you wont give him credit if it does happen. i think i wont be able to get a sensible response. im done with you.
You're an idiot. Would you give Pacquiao the same credit if he fought Cotto at 142?
Tweet
Comment