Logic puzzle for *******s: So, you guys believe Floyd has ESP or is a telepath?

[IMDAZED]

Check my post I never said Cotto was riskier, I said they're about the same risk but Cotto is the better choice money wise and it was proven with a successful PPV. you're breaking down my man.

What do you mean it was proven? Are you implying that Mosley-Pacquiao wouldn't do those numbers? If so, what in Cotto's history shows this? What big numbers had he generated prior to Pacquiao? Go ahead, answer.

[BlackHat]

I thought the only reason the Mayorga fight was made was because the Judah fight had to be cancelled? It wasnt like he was seeking out Mayorga for a fight

Yeah, I mean Mayorga isnt a household name, a very low reward fight. mosley doesnt have much choice dont you think?

[IMDAZED]

Yeah, I mean Mayorga isnt a household name, a very low reward fight. mosley doesnt have much choice dont you think?

You usually don't when a fighter pulls out or negotiations break down...ie Joshua Clottey this past Saturday. There's a big name for ya.

[BlackHat]

What do you mean it was proven? Are you implying that Mosley-Pacquiao wouldn't do those numbers? If so, what in Cotto's history shows this? What big numbers had he generated prior to Pacquiao? Go ahead, answer.

Dude that fact is Pac Cotto made a successful PPV, fighting Mosley might give a higher, or realistically lower number but it's not a fact! Also enlighten me where Tito fought Mosley.

[IMDAZED]

Dude that fact is Pac Cotto made a successful PPV, fighting Mosley might give a higher, or realistically lower number but it's not a fact! Also enlighten me where Tito fought Mosley.

Tito fought MAYORGA. Man, you're slow

And yes, we know it had a successful pay-per-view. But the same way it's not a fact that Mosley may have had a bigger one, is the same way it's not a fact that Cotto would have! So where do you stand?

[flexxx145]

There is now a duplicate ******* thread to this one.

[Lead Cenobite]

So being on a countless ppv means more money? Fact is Cotto was on a roll and is a bigger name than Mosley im talking about the casual boxing fans. Mosley is being avoided for being a high risk with low reward. Why would mosley fight a Ricardo Mayorga if he can get bigger names?


I dont take Roach word as you guys dont take Floyd's word. easy money, easy fight my ass. Roach could be just hyping Shane when he was still a viable option for Pac.

Last second replacement? Why, yes actually.

[BlackHat]

Tito fought MAYORGA. Man, you're slow

And yes, we know it had a successful pay-per-view. But the same way it's not a fact that Mosley may have had a bigger one, is the same way it's not a fact that Cotto would have! So where do you stand?

My take is it's not a bad choice fighting Cotto over Shane and your point that Pac avoided Shane is invalid.

[rao007]

My apologies not 140 but 142--by the time Mosley proposed his 140 deal---Pacquiao was already talking strictly to the Cotto camp. I guess, Shane was really desperate.

"I asked Shane if he could get down to 142, and he said no," Roach said.

[BlackHat]

Last second replacement? Why, yes actually.

Dude you already ducked me on my last reply to you. Dont quote me unless you can come up with something or you can admit that what you post is dumb.