Logic puzzle for *******s: So, you guys believe Floyd has ESP or is a telepath?
Collapse
-
No, by my logic, he was more riskier than Cotto. Who had LOST to Margarito...who Shane beat.Because he does is not a fact so try again.
He was #1 because he beat Marg who was no.1 because of his loaded gloves.
By your logic, you are saying that Shane who is 14 month inactive and is 38 yo is riskier than Pac who dominated his opponents since Marquez for Floyd because he is the no.1.Comment
-
He dominated who?
Whether you want to admit it or not, Shane Mosley was perceived as the biggest threat at 147. Get over it. How this is even debatable is mind boggling.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Shane is Shane--he's still 38years old who beat a guy trying to cheat and without the plaster margarito was easy pickings.....even Mayweather Sr. said Shane doesn't have the legs anymore.Comment
-
Fact: Cotto and Shane has the same risk for Pac
not fact: Mosley would generate more money( because he does) what the hell is that reasoning?
Fact: Pac is more of a risk that a 38 old 14 month inactive Shane.
Not fact: Floyd took a riskier fight in Mosley.Comment
-
Right. he's also the #1 welter in the world - at worst #2 and was avoided like the plague after his win over a cheater....even Freddie Roach said Shane is too good to fight.Comment
-
Fact: Mosley generates more money. Just watch when the numbers come in for Mayweather-Mosley. Then compare it to Pacquiao-Cotto.Comment


Comment