Open Scoring

[welshwales]

What do you guys think if they revealed the round scores after each round instead of at the end of a fight.


Would it be better and intice action, or would it kill the fight if the one that was behind thought he had no chance of winning.

Maybe it would mean extra action or a fighter looking for a KO as he knew he was behind.

Or would it be negative as any fighter with a comfortable lead would just run for the remainder.

What do you think?

[The Troll]

I like it better not to have open scoring.

[welshwales]

any reason why?

[The Troll]

any reason why?

I just would prefer not to have it.

[The Fix]

it would kill the suspense of the fight. the championship rounds would mean nothing.

i used to want open scoring but that still wouldnt prevent coruption. what they need to do is find billionaires to judge the fights because a billionaire already has everything and therefore it would be hard to bribe them

[borikua]

I would like to see open scoring...

[paul750]

it would kill most of the fights off. going into the later rounds the guy ahead would just do enough to win, that's IF he was well ahead on the score cards of course. bad idea, it wouldn't be as exciting.

[paul750]

I just would prefer not to have it.

could you elaborate on that McKay? maybe be more specific?

[mic573]

I don't like the idea of open scoring either. It wouldn't matter if the scores are there for viewing because a judge is going to see the fight the way he sees it. Another judge might see it different so the debate is still going to be there. Plus it would kill any suspense of a close fight.

[Manny_P]

and I got a problem. Females shoulnt be let judge fights neitha cuz they fava the sexia fighta. It aint fair man.