Dan Rafael is totally anti-hardcore boxing fan.

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Iceta Lives
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Jan 2010
    • 7178
    • 247
    • 165
    • 13,598

    #11
    Originally posted by Mr. David
    What are you talking about? He said not RIGHT NOW ... to wait to build up the fight so that it has more meaning for both the fighters as well as for the sport as a whole.
    Yeah. When both of em are stripped for not fighting their mandatories and then the fight means **** outside of the Ring belt.

    Comment

    • KILLA RIGHT
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Aug 2007
      • 8954
      • 294
      • 14
      • 16,348

      #12
      I agree with dan

      Comment

      • bojangles1987
        bo jungle
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jul 2009
        • 41118
        • 1,326
        • 357
        • 63,028

        #13
        Originally posted by Iceta Lives
        He makes it too obvious. He preaches against a fight like Alexander-Bradley in the chat today, but shoves these big name mismatches down our throat like Calzaghe-Jones, Pacquiao-Hatton, Judah vs. anybody. This guy is garbage and he needs to go.
        He actually doesn't want Alexander-Bradley to happen? Why the hell not, who should they fight instead?

        Comment

        • rskumm21
          Banned
          • Dec 2008
          • 2640
          • 199
          • 175
          • 3,033

          #14
          Dan Rafael is a Fraud.

          Comment

          • Roxas
            Banned
            • Nov 2008
            • 1492
            • 47
            • 45
            • 1,649

            #15
            Dan Rafael is one fat **** sucker

            Comment

            • boxasmash
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Aug 2008
              • 7039
              • 222
              • 63
              • 14,591

              #16
              Why the hell you got Richard Kuklinski in your av?

              Comment

              • cupcrazy01
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • May 2004
                • 2082
                • 70
                • 96
                • 12,104

                #17
                Rafael is one of the most egotistical journalists I've ever heard/read/seen, but having said that...

                His point was not that he doesn't want that fight, it's that the fight will be so much bigger down the road...not 2-3 years, but 2-3 fights from now. Impossible to disagree with that.

                The way he treats some of the people in his chats, though...sheesh. Unreal.

                Comment

                • Mr. David
                  Interim Champion
                  Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                  • Jan 2004
                  • 706
                  • 370
                  • 129
                  • 11,641

                  #18
                  Originally posted by Iceta Lives
                  Yeah. When both of em are stripped for not fighting their mandatories and then the fight means **** outside of the Ring belt.
                  The fighters make the fight, not the belts. When Antonio Tarver fought Glen Johnson, there were no title belts involved but it decided the best at 175. That'd be the same here.

                  Comment

                  • Spray_resistant
                    Vacant interim regular(C)
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Feb 2009
                    • 29696
                    • 3,005
                    • 1,588
                    • 53,384

                    #19
                    Where can I contact this Dan Rafael? He is the fluffy guy on ESPN sometimes right?

                    Comment

                    • check hook
                      Gay Pride
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Jan 2010
                      • 9361
                      • 379
                      • 137
                      • 16,005

                      #20
                      Originally posted by P4P305
                      He's a douche. It's his job to tell it like it is, but sometimes he let his emotion gets in the way. He always has something negative to say about Floyd, maybe he's just doing because he wants people's attention, and using Floyd's name will do that.

                      That's exactly why he does it.....you throw Floyd's name out there in a critical manner and u get attention.....evidence = threads like this 1......people need to stop talking about a fat slob who is less knowledgable than 50% of the posters on NSB........he is a nobody........lets treat him as such and give him zero attention

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP