Manny Pacquiao Or Willie Pep?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • hugh grant
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Apr 2006
    • 30076
    • 2,143
    • 812
    • 105,596

    #101
    I think the whole fight more times back then is a bit of a misnoma. Boxers just fought more back then and thats that. And fighters dont fight as much now because of safety regulations or what not.
    But Pac could fight the kind of opponents Pep fought to build his resume up, and had 100 wins as well. Pac could beat fighters a little lower level than Cotto, and Hatton until the cows come home.
    I think to dismiss the fighters Pac beat, the best of todays is doing a disservice to the level of boxers today. The pep back then wouldnt beat todays Pac. Any version of todays Pac at 126 or higher.
    Last edited by hugh grant; 03-12-2010, 08:54 PM.

    Comment

    • Talisayen
      Title User
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • May 2009
      • 13995
      • 5,216
      • 10,394
      • 976,564

      #102
      Everybody have their own opinions and both sides have their good points. However let's just leave the final decisions to the proper boxing authorities to rate the ATGs accordingly.

      Comment

      • Mr. Anonymous
        the don
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Oct 2009
        • 9640
        • 773
        • 825
        • 1,930

        #103
        Originally posted by No Ceilings
        Is this even up for debate. Willie Pep is one of the 10 Greatest fighters ever.
        So when Manny hits this list what will you say then?

        Comment

        Working...
        TOP