Got the ring magazine, they are so biased to Golden Boy Promotions

[$partacus]

The Ring is biased though, Golden boy has a slice of the pacman doesn't it?

but it's not just biased toward golden boy, the writers are biased toward fighters they like personally.

The ring is BS, they wrote an article about how Direll got robbed, and then put "The ring had it for froch by one round" wtf?

They have different writers that have different opinions.

[warp1432]

The Ring is biased though, Golden boy has a slice of the pacman doesn't it?

but it's not just biased toward golden boy, the writers are biased toward fighters they like personally.

The ring is BS, they wrote an article about how Direll got robbed, and then put "The ring had it for froch by one round" wtf?

Different writers.

They are not gonna be biased 2 tha bone. But The Ring Magazine reeks of Golden Boy Promotions influence.

Examples? People always like to say this, but never put forth valid reasons.

c'mon man, GBP is trying to not get sued for defamation by fighter of the decade manny pacquiao.

Not sure if you're joking, but anyone who has read The Ring or at least Ivan Goldman in the past knows that he has always been a fan of Pacquiao...