I heard a rumour that Marquez wants to defend his title agaisnt David Diaz

[Earl-Hickey]

is this true? it better bloody not be, the winner of Katsidis vs Mitchell has to be mandatory for Marquez, no exceptions.

If he fights Diaz, then wants to fight Hatton he needs to drop the title, he is hogging it and not facing his mandatorys it's not fair on the division.

[Clyde Barrow]

I want JMM vs Katsidis at some point. A Funeka fight later is a great challenge too. If Juan restores himself, maybe a rematch.

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

JMM should be looking at Soto, Guzman-Funeka winner or the Katsisid-Mitchell winner. JMM-Hatton or David Diaz is unacceptable unless ofcourse Diaz beats Soto which aint happening.

[Ch@mpBox@PR]

JMM should be looking at Soto, Guzman-Funeka winner or the Katsisid-Mitchell winner. JMM-Hatton or David Diaz is unacceptable unless ofcourse Diaz beats Soto which aint happening.

But Paul Williams can fight Andy Kolle, right? STFU. Marquez can fight whoever the **** he wants. He have earn it

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

But Paul Williams can fight Andy Kolle, right? STFU. Marquez can fight whoever the **** he wants. He have earn it

Why is every post about Williams? Williams took a stay busy. NO ONE else wanted to fight him.

[Scott9945]

is this true? it better bloody not be, the winner of Katsidis vs Mitchell has to be mandatory for Marquez, no exceptions.

If he fights Diaz, then wants to fight Hatton he needs to drop the title, he is hogging it and not facing his mandatorys it's not fair on the division.

Marquez may fight Juan Diaz, not David Diaz.

[MJ406]

yeah I don't think D.Diaz-JMM will happen any time soon

unless David can get by Soto and win back the WBC 135 title.

[Pullcounter]

is this true? it better bloody not be, the winner of Katsidis vs Mitchell has to be mandatory for Marquez, no exceptions.

If he fights Diaz, then wants to fight Hatton he needs to drop the title, he is hogging it and not facing his mandatorys it's not fair on the division.

i agree... he should fight katsidis