If Froch Won The Super 6 And Remained Undefeated, Would He Be A Greater SM than Joe

[J.Dempsey]

if he won that wit a couple KO's and a clear win against dirrell, then yes i'd consider him above Calz, even tho his chances of this are quite slim IMO

[Mrvooh]

Crotch already lost to Dirrell.

I just know Joe is more skilled

[Ch@mpBox@PR]

Nope!!!!!!

21 titles defences all 5 major belts>>>>>>>>>>>Winning the super 6

[B.U.R.N.E.R]

Whoever wins this tourney has a better resume then Joe.

[XviciousX]

Hes never gonna make it past alive pass the 3rd stage where King Abraham is going to lay him the fuck out.

[Bring It On]

No. And he won't win anyway, unless the judges decide to give him a gift in every single fight.

[broxi51]

yes he would be greater than joe if he actually won the super 6 undefeated, but i don't think he will. I couln't really judge the dirrell fight with honesty cause i though dirrell was a totally ***** and the fight was just a stinkout where both looked ****, but dirrell made the fight go that way so since he did that and i paid for it twice to watch that ****, i allow froch that one.

Calzaghe also has a couple or really close fights where some thought he lost, mainly reid and hopkins.

[daggum]

No. And he won't win anyway, unless the judges decide to give him a gift in every single fight.

this tournament would be really fun if sven ottke was in it.

[PensionKiller]

I'd say yes in terms of over all comp, but Calzaghe faced some guys that would beat Froch IMO.

I also feel Calzaghe would have beaten Forch also. I can't see Fprch winning more than 6 rounds and I also can't see Calzaghe getting KTFO by Froch who is very slow.

[Spray_resistant]

I would say yes, he would be greater.

Its all about who you beat and when you beat them.

Froch's notable wins= Dirrell, Taylor, Pascal

Joe's= Eubank, Lacy, Kessler B-hop, (shot Roy)

If you add a win over Kessler especially a ko and I would say that Froch's resume is just barely below equal to Joe's.