If Floyd Refused......

[pasawayako]

if floyd refused? it's because he has the right to do so.

[Clyde Barrow]

What would everybody think if Floyd refused to take a drug test that could make him 25 million & be in the biggest fight in history?

I don't know mate.

But people would think you're a daft **** if you kept making threads and posts about a fight you had obviously never seen.

[FLY TY]

and for the record, no one should have to prove wether they're gay or not. that **** is ******.

it's a hypothetical thread...like i said, it went over a lot of ppl's heads, i guess.


the point of the thread was simple......

pac gets accused of being a 'roider, he opts out of taking a test to prove otherwise, but ppl still question why the guy is seen as a suspected cheat....


mayweather gets accused of being gay, on this forum, and if THERE WAS A TEST to prove he wasn't, and he refused to take it, what would everyone think about him?


**** really wasn't that complicated an analogy, out of left-field probably, but one dude got what i was getting at.......

**** it tho......

[MikeyHurley]

Only way mayeathers sexuality would be relevant in the same way pacs possible steroid use would be in the phucked up scenario that he and Pac were tag-teamin a broad. Other than that it matters not, it does however matter if Pac is juicing up.

Pac has a duty to be clean in a potential fight w/ PBF and vice-versa and has a hell of a lot of cash/opportunity o be gained if he passes.

Plus, although with no actual evidence, the allegations made against Pac are a far bigger possiblity than some ridiculous theory about a man who has 3 or 4 children already made up by losers who care more about there hate for an athlete than there own feeble lives.

[FLY TY]

if floyd refused? it's because he has the right to do so.

and i'm pretty sure that would be your opinion...

[Bogig]

Standardize the tests first.

The drug test and this gay test, if there was one.

But don't accuse anyone of being guilty just because they refuse to take a test that is not required and has never been required in the history of the sport!

Simple as that.

[2501]

it's a hypothetical thread...like i said, it went over a lot of ppl's heads, i guess.


the point of the thread was simple......

pac gets accused of being a 'roider, he opts out of taking a test to prove otherwise, but ppl still question why the guy is seen as a suspected cheat....


mayweather gets accused of being gay, on this forum, and if THERE WAS A TEST to prove he wasn't, and he refused to take it, what would everyone think about him?


**** really wasn't that complicated an analogy, out of left-field probably, but one dude got what i was getting at.......

**** it tho......

it just wasn't a good comparison. thats all.

[UnDeniable]

it just wasn't a good comparison. thats all.

LOL @ your sig, Steelhammer is a ****

[Haterfree]

what would everyone think if PAC walked away from $25mil because of a 'hunch'? they'd call him a *****

He already has. He had a "hunch" that a teaspoon of blood taken will hurt him.

[ModernTalking]

and for the record, no one should have to prove wether they're gay or not. that **** is ******.

What if Manny doesn't fight woman and he want's Floyd to prove that's he's a man.