GET UR FACTS STRAIGHT' talk show LIVE 3-3-2010 11PM est (IT'S ON !!)

[Horus]

'GET UR FACTS STRAIGHT' talk show...

[IMG]http://i30.***********.com/albums/c318/Quntel/get_the_facts-1.jpg[/IMG]

THE LINK TO MY SHOW IS IN MY SIG, AND ALSO BELOW THIS.
http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web...d=72140&cmd=tc

Hosted by: xHORUSx
Phone Number: (724) 444-7444
Call ID: 72140
For those who could not get access to the show...
Try out this Link
http://www.talkshoe.com/tc/72140


It should work...
You will have to create an pin to call in but it is free...and take less than 30 seconds to do.


You can also listen to and download past episodes!!

Wednesday's Topics



Mayweather vs. Mosley: Who R U Picking?
Was the Mayweather-Mosley altercation staged?
Schaefer predicts 3 million PPV buys for Mayweather-Mosley !
Mayweather vs. Mosley 14,000 of 17,000 tickets already SOLD?
AT&T is doing a commercial for Mayweather vs. Mosley?
Is Mayweather-Mosley fight is sucking the air out of Pacquiao-Clottey ?
No steroid testing for Pacquiao-Clottey fight?
Pacquiao vs. Clottey: Breakdown
SHOTS FIRED FROM Philippine's @ Pacquiao: ‘High IQ not qualification for public office’
Cloud vs. Johnson called off
Alexander vs. Urango this Saturday
Amir Khan: Is he for real?
What is wrong with ‘running’ in boxing?
Chavez Jr. suspended seven months, could face Duddy in June
Is Calzaghe itching to fight Froch?
Green vs. Ward: Is Allan too confident for his own good?
James Toney signs multi-fight contract with the UFC

[da chosen 1]

good topics i cant wait, i might call in

[Horus]

‘High IQ not qualification for public office’

MANILA, Philippines—Saying a high IQ is never a gauge of good public service, the Commission on Elections (Comelec) has junked disqualification cases against Sen. Manuel “Lito” Lapid and world boxing champ Manny Pacquiao, whose candidacies in the May elections were questioned for lack of academic credentials.

The Comelec’s second division found no merit in the petition filed by Ely Pamatong, a flamboyant lawyer and himself a disqualified presidential aspirant whom poll officials earlier ordered detained for calling them “thieves” during a public hearing in January.

Pamatong argued that Lapid, a reelectionist, was “hardly educated” and knew little about lawmaking, while congressional aspirant Pacquiao was “mentally very poor and not prepared to step into the ring of legislation.”

He also said candidates mired in “mental poverty” should be declared a nuisance, in the same way candidates with scant finances get booted out of the race.

The lawyer also branded Lapid and Pacquiao as “unqualified professional entertainers.” Lapid used to be an action star while Pacquiao dabbled in movies, TV sitcoms and recordings in between his megabuck fights.

But the poll body ruled that aspiring public officials need not have a high educational attainment.

‘Highly opinionated’

The Comelec noted that after giving a “highly opinionated critique” of Lapid and Pacquiao’s intellectual capacity, Pamatong failed to present proof that the two candidates fell short of the requirements for seeking public office.

“A candidate’s high educational attainment has never been held as qualification for public office. To be sure, the quality of public service which an elected official can render is not measured by the level of his intelligence,” the poll body said.

Pamatong also produced no evidence that Lapid and Pacquiao were nuisance candidates out to make a mockery of the May 10 elections, the Comelec added in a March 2 ruling.

Lapid, who is seeking reelection under the administration’s Lakas-Kampi-CMD coalition, placed 12th—just making it within the winning dozen—in a recent Pulse Asia survey of senatorial contenders.

Pacquiao is taking a second crack at a House seat as Saranggani representative. In 2007, the ring icon lost to the incumbent Darlene Antonino-Custodio in the congressional contest in South Cotabato.

[Horus]

Should be a great show tonight fella's

[Akyra]

i mightttt call.......

[Horus]

Is Calzaghe itching to fight Froch?
By Sean McDaniel:


Judging by the way that former super middleweight champion Joe Calzaghe (46-0, 32 KO’s) is still going on about WBC super middleweight champion Carl Froch, I think Calzaghe might be thinking about fighting Froch. I mean why else would Calzaghe still be talking about Froch after all this time. Calzaghe hasn’t fought in over a year since he defeated Roy Jones Jr. by a one-sided 12 round decision in November 2008. That’s not that much time away from the sport, and Calzaghe still looks youthful at 37. No gray hair, wrinkles and has stayed in tip top condition.


Calzaghe would have an excellent chance of beating Froch if he was to get a shot at him now. I’m not sure if that would still be the case if he has to wait until Froch has completed his participation in the Super Six tournament next year. Froch might be eliminated from the Super Six tournament by the end of 2010, because he has two tough fights coming up against Mikkel Kessler and Arthur Abraham this year.

The Kessler fight would seem like Froch’s best chance of winning, but as bad as Froch looked in defeating Andre Dirrell by a controversial 12 round decision last October, I wouldn’t put money on Froch being able to beat a fighter as polished as Kessler. That seems like a really risky fight for Froch. Calzaghe recently called him “a spoilt, little bloody b*tch.” For Calzaghe to say something like this out of the blue, it seems like he might be thinking about wanting to test himself against Froch.

To be sure, if Calzaghe was to take on Froch and beat him, it would be a huge win for Joe. A victory over Froch would obviously help cement Calzaghe’s credentials as one of the greatest fighters ever. It’s a victory that Calzaghe would gain a lot from, both financially and in the minds of the boxing public. Froch has quickly become a fairly popular fighter in the UK, as he’s mentioned quite a lot in the media.

Calzaghe, for obvious reasons, doesn’t get discussed as much nowadays by the boxing media because he’s retired and no longer a topic for discussion. Calzaghe may have retired a little early. He still was fighting at a high level when he retired and could have made more money by sticking around and taking on a few select fighters.

Calzaghe wouldn’t have had to fight in the Super Six tournament, although the pressure would be high for him to have done so. But a fight against Froch would be the perfect way for Calzaghe to retire on. Froch is the best fighter in that weight class in the UK, and it would be the perfect fight for Calzaghe to take. He matches up incredibly well with the much slower Froch.

This is a fight that Calzaghe wins even with a year off from boxing. The only problem is finding the time to fight Froch. Unless Froch was allowed to squeeze in a fight between his Super Six tourney commitments, it would mean that Calzaghe would have to wait for the remainder of 2010 before he could get a fight with Froch. By that time, Calzaghe will be 38-years-old and that might be a little too old for a fight against Froch.

Share and Enjoy:

[Horus]

Airborne with Mikkel and Carl

[Horus]

i mightttt call.......

Yea man do so, tonight should be fun..

[Horus]

I am hearing that the D.C press conference was PRO Mayweather...
Silly me, let some of you tell it.. the guy has no fans

[THE REED]

Was hoping it was on..

Lefty and Burner have been dropping the ball