I dont get it? What is wrong with ‘running’?

[jrosales13]

Why do I want to continue to talk to someone who exposed themselves as a Pacquiao stan? That says a lot about you already, buddy.

But, this Pacquiao stan has a great possibility in exposing you in any boxing debate...

[Measy1749]

Look, if you're not going to understand my posts, then don't reply.

Here's a direct quote from my post in this thread.



Jesus, this is my problem with Red K'd people.

They don't read anything. Just spout off random BS.

dude, the point is if it is skill involved it aint a potshot. point. blank. period. do u hear urself? look up the definition of a potshot. so even if u call it a potshot with skill involved, it's no longer a potshot! thats like calling someone pretty and ugly at the same time. and u think i dont understand...smh. ur definition of a potshot is not the true definition of a potshot. thats a fact!

[tesla_power]

Nothing wrong with it. He should just learn not to say some rough stuff about murdering people in the ring then proceed to potshot them to death. Remember the build up to the Jmm fight, he said as soon as he got Jmm down, he will finish him unlike pac who didn't. We'll what happened after the round 2 KD. The risk-less approach was still used even when he knew that
a. Jmm could not hurt him
b. The slower Jmm's skills could not be carried to WW.

It is good also to try some risk, saw again Sanchez-Nelson last night, man that was some effective "running" by Sal. In the end, he broke down Azumah.

[ThePunchingBag]

dude, the point is if it is skill involved it aint a potshot. point. blank. period. do u hear urself? look up the definition of a potshot. so even if u call it a potshot with skill involved, it's no longer a potshot! thats like calling someone pretty and ugly at the same time. and u think i dont understand...smh. ur definition of a potshot is not the true definition of a potshot. thats a fact!

Google "Floyd potshot" then come back and tell me your twisted bull****.

[Rolling Stone]

They do it 24/7 to one man... Because, of what is going on... Now you can be dillusional and say the extremist from Floyd fans don't do the same to Pac 24/7... And, obvious you don't know much about me becuase if you did you would know that I have been here and debated against Pacdbest me and him do not agree on anything, I don't agree with Barecuda or what ever his name is ever and I have had debates with them in the past. So what image am I trying to keep intact? You sound foolish...

HAHHAHHA....i think you know damn well what i mean....don't try and play innocent, almost everyone on this site has an agenda and fair play to you mate

[jrosales13]

Read carefully, I said Pacstans If you aren't a Pacstan don't bother getting all butthurt over what I said.

But since you took what I said personally well then I guess some people were wrong about you..

But, you really are no better than the "Pacstand"

[The Great Shark]

Yes they do they say he is just a brawler... That is all they give him credit for... That is why they have him loosing every fantasy fight cuz of his "style" Some think Jorge Linares could of beaten him at 126 cuz of his "style"... They made a thread about... That is down playing his "style"...

No.

They downplay his skills, not his style. Everyone loves a brawlers style because it's exciting due to the amount of damage they cause and the risk they take.

Mayweather using the space he's given, utilizing everything from the ring to his skills to break down the opponent. Who's fault is it that he's able to fight and still back up and not get hit?

Pacstans ***** so much they would probably love boxing if the ring was 4x4 feet in size.

[jrosales13]

HAHHAHHA....i think you know damn well what i mean....don't try and play innocent, almost everyone on this site has an agenda and fair play to you mate

Really what do you mean then? What image am trying to save? What is your agenda? What is my agenda? What exactly are you talking about?

[Rolling Stone]

Really what do you mean then? What image am trying to save? What is your agenda? What is my agenda? What exactly are you talking about?

you sound like a total dimwit so please just stop embarrasing yourself

[jrosales13]

No.

They downplay his skills, not his style. Everyone loves a brawlers style because it's exciting due to the amount of damage they cause and the risk they take.

Mayweather using the space he's given, utilizing everything from the ring to his skills to break down the opponent. Who's fault is it that he's able to fight and still back up and not get hit?

Pacstans ***** so much they would probably love boxing if the ring was 4x4 feet in size.

Are the Pac fans who ***** about Floyd style... Could it be just cuz is Floyd and not really the style? Do you see the other fighters that have a similar get as much **** for it then Floyd from Pac fans?