M. Moorer Best Light HW Ever

[TheGreat1]

so who do you guys think was the better 175er?

DM or Qawi?

by the way the useful answers would come from ppl who saw both of them fighing

that leaves me out because i have never seen DM fight. But Qawi was very good.

[TheGreat1]

id put bob foster over sam langford, id put more but sam had a long career and ive never seen him fight, if he wasnt any good id put gene tunny and conn over him as well

who do u thinks wins between holyfield vs. Foster? I'd take holy by ko

[AintGottaClue]

who do u thinks wins between holyfield vs. Foster? I'd take holy by ko

just because MM can beat holy doesnt mean foster cant beat moorer

[TheGreat1]

just because MM can beat holy doesnt mean foster cant beat moorer

I think you missed my question. I asked who do you think wins between Foster and Holyfield. It has nothing to do with MM. Because i understand that styles make fights. But i have only seen foster fight once, and that was against Frazier. I assumed you have seen more fights of him, because you speak very high of foster. Thats why i ask you who wins between Foster and Holy.

[AintGottaClue]

I think you missed my question. I asked who do you think wins between Foster and Holyfield. It has nothing to do with MM. Because i understand that styles make fights. But i have only seen foster fight once, and that was against Frazier. I assumed you have seen more fights of him, because you speak very high of foster. Thats why i ask you who wins between Foster and Holy.

holy would win, foster isnt very good outside of his divsion, he has the best right hand ever at light heavy though, holy has to good of a chin for foster at cruiser or heavy not to mention right after losing to ali and fraizer by brutal KO's he came back in his next fight to regain his titles

[.::EnRiQuE::.]

shut up you take it in da butt

[TheGreat1]

I started this thread a while back, after Watching Tarver, I'm wondering If Tarver could have beaten Moorer, what would have been great fight, Tarver has great skills,

[JUYJUY]

Moorer is certainly better than any LHW Jones has faced.

I know I'm a Eubank nut-hugger, but deal with it. Eubank beat Moorer as an amateur at 156 in 1984, sorry guys I just had to get that in there.

[TheGreat1]

Moorer is certainly better than any LHW Jones has faced.

I know I'm a Eubank nut-hugger, but deal with it. Eubank beat Moorer as an amateur at 156 in 1984, sorry guys I just had to get that in there.

do u think he would have beaten him as a PRO?

[oldgringo]

do u think he would have beaten him as a PRO?

No way. The size and strength differential is too great.

I also think that Moorer would have beaten Tarver, in similar fashion to the way he beat Stewart. Being somewhat outboxed and behind on the cards (I think that was the Stewart fight) and he comes back and KO's him.

Tarver has shown that he can be hurt and dropped and I think Moorer was too good a fighter at 175 to lose to a Tarver caliber fighter.