Champion vs Champion: 1984 vs 2005

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Bozo_no no
    Palabras de Piedra
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Apr 2005
    • 8906
    • 416
    • 496
    • 16,069

    #31
    Originally posted by TheGreat1
    Isn't Jeff Lacy the Super Middle weight Champ?

    As of May 9th, the Ring has Super Middle vacent.

    I like Lacey best at 168, but I was only inputting the ring rankings as they are at the moment.

    Comment

    • Yogi
      Hey, Boo Boo
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jun 2004
      • 2665
      • 174
      • 97
      • 9,583

      #32
      Originally posted by oldgringo
      I think he had a slight reach advantage in terms of arm length but do you know if his back was as broad? I think that may have a slight effect on it too.

      That's just the thing, a lot of the guys that Holmes had his way with would have troubled all of the HW champs of today. It speaks volumes about the current state of HW boxing.
      Holmes reach is listed as being 81". Vitali's is listed as being 80" (both according to boxrec).

      Gringo, the broadness of each of their backs is taken into account when measuring their respective reaches. Arms wide apart, fingertip to fingertip...That's a fighter's reach.

      I thinks it's safe to say Vitali's back is thicker/wider than Holmes, because in his prime, Larry was fairly thin up in the shoulder area. That would also mean that Holmes' arm length more than makes up for the difference (considering Holmes' reach is slightly more), and he would have to be noticably longer in arm length than what Vitali is...Know what I mean?

      Comment

      • oldgringo
        Ellis
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Jul 2004
        • 12747
        • 968
        • 453
        • 30,064

        #33
        Originally posted by Yogi
        Holmes reach is listed as being 81". Vitali's is listed as being 80" (both according to boxrec).

        Gringo, the broadness of each of their backs is taken into account when measuring their respective reaches. Arms wide apart, fingertip to fingertip...That's a fighter's reach.

        I thinks it's safe to say Vitali's back is thicker/wider than Holmes, because in his prime, Larry was fairly thin up in the shoulder area. That would also mean that Holmes' arm length more than makes up for the difference (considering Holmes' reach is slightly more), and he would have to be noticably longer in arm length than what Vitali is...Know what I mean?

        Gotcha. I was thinking something else for some reason. Anyway, I think that you're right about the arm length and its only logical that Holmes would have the longer arms. Holmes himself was what....6'3 1/2 or something?

        Comment

        • Yogi
          Hey, Boo Boo
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jun 2004
          • 2665
          • 174
          • 97
          • 9,583

          #34
          Originally posted by oldgringo
          Gotcha. I was thinking something else for some reason. Anyway, I think that you're right about the arm length and its only logical that Holmes would have the longer arms. Holmes himself was what....6'3 1/2 or something?
          Yeah, Holmes was in that 6'3/6'4 range.

          Comment

          • JT1
            Up and Comer
            Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
            • Jul 2005
            • 40
            • 23
            • 24
            • 6,576

            #35
            Winky would have no chance of outboxing Hearns. Never mind Leonard, Hearns also outboxed slicksters Hill and Benitez. The latter is an all time great and a superb boxer, but Tommy put on an absolute clinic. Tommy was a terror for the straight boxer beacuse not only could he outbox them but the threat of the huge right hand was always there.

            Comment

            Working...
            TOP