Comments Thread For: “Fighting Words” – Sudden Dearth: Heartbreak, Emptiness

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BIGPOPPAPUMP
    Franchise Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2003
    • 46539
    • 2,259
    • 334
    • 5,493,285

    #1

    Comments Thread For: “Fighting Words” – Sudden Dearth: Heartbreak, Emptiness

    by David P. Greisman - There would be no heartbreak if not for the closeness that precedes it and the distance felt following its abrupt arrival.

    It is a shock to the system, unfortunately unforeseen, unsettlingly unstoppable. Happiness drains. Emptiness reigns.

    We have hobbies, and those hobbies produce heroes, people whose fame, talents and perceived personalities produce such emotional connections despite the division between celebrities and commoners.

    It is why large crowds showed to mourn Michael Jackson, whose death one man was quoted as comparing to the assassination of President Kennedy – “I will always remember being in Times Square when Michael Jackson died,” the man told the Associated Press.

    With actors, with singers and with dignitaries, grief results from death, from the person no longer being. With individual athletes, heartbreak comes from the person no longer being what we remember them being.

    In no sport is that decline more immediate and more evident than boxing. We who are boxing fans all derive pleasure from the sport as a whole. But we all then become fans of certain boxers, investing extra emotion and attention, at first living vicariously through their victories, then later suffering sympathetically after their losses.

    It can happen as quickly as a knockout, shattering the aura of invincibility. It can be painfully prolonged, with deteriorating skills leaving them shells of themselves. A fighter can recover much more easily from the setback of getting beat than he can from getting beat up and shellacked. [Click Here To Read More]
  • Devils Advocate
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Mar 2008
    • 5356
    • 203
    • 832
    • 18,304

    #2
    Originally posted by BIGPOPPAPUMP
    by David P. Greisman - There would be no heartbreak if not for the closeness that precedes it and the distance felt following its abrupt arrival.

    It is a shock to the system, unfortunately unforeseen, unsettlingly unstoppable. Happiness drains. Emptiness reigns.

    We have hobbies, and those hobbies produce heroes, people whose fame, talents and perceived personalities produce such emotional connections despite the division between celebrities and commoners.

    It is why large crowds showed to mourn Michael Jackson, whose death one man was quoted as comparing to the assassination of President Kennedy – “I will always remember being in Times Square when Michael Jackson died,” the man told the Associated Press.

    With actors, with singers and with dignitaries, grief results from death, from the person no longer being. With individual athletes, heartbreak comes from the person no longer being what we remember them being.

    In no sport is that decline more immediate and more evident than boxing. We who are boxing fans all derive pleasure from the sport as a whole. But we all then become fans of certain boxers, investing extra emotion and attention, at first living vicariously through their victories, then later suffering sympathetically after their losses.

    It can happen as quickly as a knockout, shattering the aura of invincibility. It can be painfully prolonged, with deteriorating skills leaving them shells of themselves. A fighter can recover much more easily from the setback of getting beat than he can from getting beat up and shellacked. [Click Here To Read More]
    Man what a depressing article to read on Sunday evening!!! Of course Tyson will be voted into the boxing hall of fame he should of been already, his last real fight was against Douglas.

    Comment

    • Lacrimosa
      I am betman!
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Apr 2009
      • 1364
      • 53
      • 206
      • 7,755

      #3
      Like Roy Jones, losing all but one round to Joe Calzaghe.
      Excuse me?

      Comment

      • Mr. David
        Interim Champion
        Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
        • Jan 2004
        • 704
        • 369
        • 129
        • 11,641

        #4
        Originally posted by ~Alar~
        Excuse me?
        118-109, 118-109, 118-109. All but the first to Calzaghe. What's the issue?

        Comment

        • Lacrimosa
          I am betman!
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Apr 2009
          • 1364
          • 53
          • 206
          • 7,755

          #5
          Originally posted by Mr. David
          118-109, 118-109, 118-109. All but the first to Calzaghe. What's the issue?
          The cards are the issue... If people looked not on Calzaghe making faces and hitting air, they could have seen that the second round could go to Jones, as well as 6th or 7th (both were close, one should`ve go to RJJ) and definitely the 12th round...

          I`m just getting angry when some ridiculous distractions distort reality (in this case, Calzaghes behavior prevented judges from scoring the fight more objectively)...

          IMO

          Comment

          • Mr. David
            Interim Champion
            Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
            • Jan 2004
            • 704
            • 369
            • 129
            • 11,641

            #6
            Originally posted by ~Alar~
            The cards are the issue... If people looked not on Calzaghe making faces and hitting air, they could have seen that the second round could go to Jones, as well as 6th or 7th (both were close, one should`ve go to RJJ) and definitely the 12th round...

            I`m just getting angry when some ridiculous distractions distort reality (in this case, Calzaghes behavior prevented judges from scoring the fight more objectively)...

            IMO
            I can understand what you mean about scorecards not always reflecting the complete reality, but the reality is Jones still got tagged a lot in that fight.

            This was my perspective the Monday after the fight. I'm sure you'll disagree, but that's okay. I appreciate your giving my article a read.

            Of the 475 punches Jones threw, he landed just one-third, an average of just 13 a round. That output just about matched the work rate of Jones’ last three fights, in which he landed 14 of 37 shots for every three minutes. In his prime years, between 1998 and 2002, Jones still threw only 39 punches per round, but he would land an average of 20, a connect percentage of better than 50 percent.

            Forty-five percent of Jones’ power punches landed against Calzaghe. But Calzaghe, as he has done in the past, adjusted early in the fight, ducking to his right to make many of Jones’ crosses, which had landed before, miss their target. And when he wasn’t elusive, he was active, hitting Jones with more punches than anyone else ever had before – 344. Calzaghe more than doubled Jones in number of shots landed, hitting him nearly 29 times a round.

            What Jones could still do, Calzaghe could do better. So as Jones followed Calzaghe around the ring, attempting to land, Calzaghe had little difficulty strafing the person in front of him. And when Jones went to the ropes, Calzaghe was there with a flurry, never letting him rest.

            Comment

            • Lacrimosa
              I am betman!
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Apr 2009
              • 1364
              • 53
              • 206
              • 7,755

              #7
              Originally posted by Mr. David
              I can understand what you mean about scorecards not always reflecting the complete reality, but the reality is Jones still got tagged a lot in that fight.

              I'm sure you'll disagree, but that's okay. I appreciate your giving my article a read.
              I`m not questioning Calzaghe`s victory - i`m just saying it was closer, than many want it to look...

              I should have told about it... The article was great I just didn`t bother writing about something good then

              Comment

              Working...
              TOP