Tweet
**** doesn't make any sense.. 
-
-
It would make sense if you actually knew anything about boxing.
Froch is world class, thats why he beat Pascal.
And very underrated by the idiots on this site. -
By outoughing him in that great brawl and in times using his underrated jab to control the pace.
But truth be told Pascal wasn't as good then as he is know and also fought the wrong gameplan from the beggining not to mentione he was gassed by the 6th.
In a rematch I'd take Pascal.Comment
-
That was a world class old school fight, Pascal fought Froch's fight and got beat but it wasnt an easy fight for froch.Comment
-
Pascal was weight drainned and a home town ref who let Froch get away with dirty back-of-the-head rabbit punchesComment
-
Because pascal liked to square up and go toe to toe. he didn't use his natural talents to box more like he does now. though he still likes to square up and go to war.
i think pascal got tired too around 7/8. after that froch used his jab and controlled him.Comment
-
He beat Pascal because he is better than Pascal, simple as that.Comment
-
pascal is way more physically gifted then froch imo he shoulda won that fight ... but he gave it away by fighting the wrong gameplan, he went to brawl wasnt busy enuf and lost to a better brawler. imo pascal lacks maturity discipline and focus in the ring ... he fights every rd like theres an on off switch in his head and he gets hit too muchComment
-
He learnt a lot from that fight and seems to be slightly more discilplined now. He recognises his strengths in speed and combo's and gets out of there better.
Had he done that more against Froch he'd have won. Showed great heart in trying to out war the brute, and nearly beat him at his own game. But it just wasn't the right game plan for him to win.Comment
-
pascal fought frochs fight
i think the occasion got to him and being abroad he thought he had to be aggressive to win
had he boxed instead of brawled he would have won a clear decision,but it is what it isComment
Comment