Bernard Hopkins should have won fighter of the decade.

[revs1227]

id go with pac but u can make an argument for hopkins

[oc9979]

making his opponents jump up/down two weight classes ruined any credibility he could've earned from me

You could make the same arguement about catchweight.
Fighting David Diaz for a title??

[General Zod]

making his opponents jump up/down two weight classes ruined any credibility he could've earned from me

I completely agree, he should of fought guys he own size instead i.e LHW's instead of constantly cherry picking from two divisions below. His three losses to the best guys he fought also hurt his rating Taylor is now 1-4 in his last five fights and he beat Hopkins twice, Calzaghe isnt even a LHW and he beat Hopkins as well.

[Ben_London]

Bump for Bully.

[hugh grant]

On the surface what BH has done of late seems impressive, but he stinks the place out a lot of the time.
He beat Pavlik, because Pavlik was not that experienced and was not schooled or coached as well, compared to Pac now.
Plus the way he complained against JC didnt do himself any favours. When he had a real challenged against a very good boxer near his prime boxer JC, BH looked very mortal.

With his experience he is doing well for his age thats for sure though.

[street bully]

He sure as hell has a case, however, titles in 7 different weight classes, and goign from FW to WW in a year and dominating is impressive.