Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pacquiao is Henry Armstrong in this era, who is PBF?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by madsweeney View Post
    Considering Pacquiao has won championships in 4 of the original weight classes (Armstrong won in only 3) I'd say he's at least near his level...as near as any modern boxer can get.


    dont mind him Mads...he has an overrated account of his boxing acumen...check all his boxing predictions regarding PAC...he even has a 17 year old newspaper boy named Rico from Michigan that would whoop PAC

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by Makavelli View Post
      dont mind him Mads...he has an overrated account of his boxing acumen...check all his boxing predictions regarding PAC...he even has a 17 year old newspaper boy named Rico from Michigan that would whoop PAC
      So winning titles at WW, LW and FW make you Armstrong? Please explain how Pac is Henry Armstong. Im asking YOUR knowledge on this subject. Explain it to me, without some sassy 5th grade girl response. Or a ****ty one line. How is Pac Henry Armstrong?

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by El Castigador View Post
        You know nothing about boxing dude. You are a clown. Tell me how Pac compares to Henry.



        im gonna start chargin you for the daily education of the sweet science you little pretender


        tell me again how Sergio Martinez is a better name than any name on Calzaghe's record...go on...entertain me you ******ed buffoon

        Comment


        • #14
          Did Armstrong look for catchweights? No offense, serious question.

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by Makavelli View Post
            im gonna start chargin you for the daily education of the sweet science you little pretender


            tell me again how Sergio Martinez is a better name than any name on Calzaghe's record...go on...entertain me you ******ed buffoon
            Why are you changing the subject? How is Pacman Henry Armstrong. Please break it down for me.

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by Dominicano Soy! View Post
              Did Armstrong look for catchweights? No offense, serious question.
              This mutherfucker Armstrong got 19 WW Title defenses and they telling me hes Pac?

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by El Castigador View Post
                If he wants to be Armstrong he needs to beat Pavlik, then the Super six winner.
                In terms of division's, that doesn't make any sense at all. Flyweight to Welter is already a bigger spread in terms of original eight classes as Armstrong's Feather to Middle (for a night and robbed). If Pac can legitimize himself as THE Welter champ (and he's got a ways to go in terms of foes), he'd be fine.

                It's still not Armstrong.

                What he's doing is somewhere in between McLarnin and Armstrong. Hank was the champ in three divisions at once. Pac won't do that and the opportunity long passed. He'd have had to beat Barrera, then Mayweather and finally Spinks (that was the spread around the time he beat MAB the first time) in a year at Feather, Light, and Welter to equal what Armstrong pulled off even if the titles wouldn't have all been simultaneous today.

                Mclarnin battled the best from being a small Bantam in the pre-day before weigh in era up to the Welter crown; he didn't win the titles of the lower classes but he beat some fantastic opp.

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by Makavelli View Post
                  dont mind him Mads...he has an overrated account of his boxing acumen...check all his boxing predictions regarding PAC...he even has a 17 year old newspaper boy named Rico from Michigan that would whoop PAC
                  I know, bored at work and not in the mood to argue politics (the other forums I lurk)

                  Originally posted by El Castigador View Post
                  So winning titles at WW, LW and FW make you Armstrong? Please explain how Pac is Henry Armstong. Im asking YOUR knowledge on this subject. Explain it to me, without some sassy 5th grade girl response. Or a ****ty one line. How is Pac Henry Armstrong?
                  Considering Armstrong is renowned for his ability to fight across multiple weight classes, yes, Pacquiao is very much like him. Nobody is saying he's exactly the same fighter, rather, his achievements are similar. I understand your bias and dense but there's really no reason to be so bigoted on this subject.

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by El Castigador View Post
                    Why are you changing the subject? How is Pacman Henry Armstrong. Please break it down for me.


                    did i say he was? find me that post...please do it...IF you cant, then explain to me how Sergio is a better name than anyone on Calzaghe's resume...the same Sergio whose resume you question yourself


                    go on you muppet...make me laugh...show us the brilliance of your boxing knowledge

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by Makavelli View Post
                      did i say he was? find me that post...please do it...IF you cant, then explain to me how Sergio is a better name than anyone on Calzaghe's resume...the same Sergio whose resume you question yourself


                      go on you muppet...make me laugh...show us the brilliance of your boxing knowledge
                      Burner IRL...true story!!!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP