Barrera vs Pacquiao..Rematch....Who Wins It?

[Run]

Barrera doesn't have a jab.

stop posting.

You suck at it.



Never pay again for live sex! | Hot girls doing naughty stuff for free! | Chat for free!

[Pak men]

stop posting.

You suck at it.

you stop posting buddy. If you can't handle the heat and you don't have anymore pertinent arguments to speak of, just shut up.

Gets?

[Moon]

I don't think he's old enough to be underestimated nor are his skills so deminished that he should be dismissed from having a chance. Pac is good but cannot be considered unbeatable in a rematch. Peace.

You don't belong here. You talk too sensibly and unbiased. Don't you know this is a "Pac" thread?

[Moon]

..... COWARD MAB .... sissy ..... fight noobs like Peden and still can't knock him out. PAthetic!

Why is it that Pac fans can't recognize that MAB has given boxing fans much more than Pac has? Marco beat another belt-holder in Peden, end of story. Sure it was not a KO, but it was a dominant performance and he now wears another belt. Words like "sissy" and "coward" cannot be used when dscribing MAB, except it seems if you are a Pac fan who is blinded by your ignorance of the long history of the sport.

We all know Pac KO'd Marco. So that makes Pac a featherweight knockout artist? I don't think so. Pac has gone the distance with both Marquez and Morales, not getting a win in either bout. Although Pac clearly beat Barrera, MAB stayed in there for 11 rounds of ass-whoopin'. Now you have the balls to say that Barrera should be knocking out this guy or that guy? Why not hold Pac to the same standard?

Also, if you think Barrera is a "coward" for taking Pac's shots for 11 rounds, clearly getting his assed handed to him, but still throwing and fighting, you are ****ed up, really. That's not the stuff of cowards.

Truth is, Pac is the fighter that has not yet proven himself to be a dominant force against the top-tier Feathers. Pac is definitely worthy of facing the best guys, and Pac's speed and power are a thing to behold, and he has warior heart, but Pac remains 1-1-1 in the big Feather fights.

If Pac looses to Barerra, which I predict he will, he will be relegated to "contender" status, as he should be, since he'll be wearing a record of 1-2-1 as a top Feather. Nobody will be knocked out in the fight either, so I suppose that makes for a boring fight, eh?

[Pak men]

Why is it that Pac fans can't recognize that MAB has given boxing fans much more than Pac has? Marco beat another belt-holder in Peden, end of story. Sure it was not a KO, but it was a dominant performance and he now wears another belt. Words like "sissy" and "coward" cannot be used when dscribing MAB, except it seems if you are a Pac fan who is blinded by your ignorance of the long history of the sport.

We all know Pac KO'd Marco. So that makes Pac a featherweight knockout artist? I don't think so. Pac has gone the distance with both Marquez and Morales, not getting a win in either bout. Although Pac clearly beat Barrera, MAB stayed in there for 11 rounds of ass-whoopin'. Now you have the balls to say that Barrera should be knocking out this guy or that guy? Why not hold Pac to the same standard?

Also, if you think Barrera is a "coward" for taking Pac's shots for 11 rounds, clearly getting his assed handed to him, but still throwing and fighting, you are ****ed up, really. That's not the stuff of cowards.

Truth is, Pac is the fighter that has not yet proven himself to be a dominant force against the top-tier Feathers. Pac is definitely worthy of facing the best guys, and Pac's speed and power are a thing to behold, and he has warior heart, but Pac remains 1-1-1 in the big Feather fights.

If Pac looses to Barerra, which I predict he will, he will be relegated to "contender" status, as he should be, since he'll be wearing a record of 1-2-1 as a top Feather. Nobody will be knocked out in the fight either, so I suppose that makes for a boring fight, eh?

That is, if COWARD MARCO ANTONIO BARRERA has the balls of a man to fight PAC again. As things stand, he's holding on to his chastity belts so damn hard he's looking like a fluke.

When you're an elite, you prove it by beating other elites. Not fighting noobs who were once former sparring mates. lol! That's a clear sign of a COWARD. lol!

[grayfist]

Anent, Barrera not taking "Morales' left-overs":

*Morales won by UD over Paulie Ayala in Nov. 2002;

Barrera took out Ayala in the 10th round on 19 June 2004

* Kevin Kelley was TKO'd by Morales on Sept. 9, 2000;

MAB met Kelley two years and 7 months later (April 12, 2003) and took him out too.



Morales also took on at least one of MAB's left-overs:

* Eddie Croft whom Barrera took out in the 7th in a WBO SuperBantam title fight in 1995, and whom Morales trounced in 2003 in Mexico in what was widely criticized as a mistmatch.Even Morales himself (as reported) regretted having to face Croft. He was quoted as having said, "I just fight anyone they put in front of me. I don't make the rankings."



Morales fought and defeated Junior Jones (TKO 4) in 1998, but he could not be-- strictly speaking-- considered a Barrera "left-over". He had earlier beaten Barrera in their two meetings-- first by DQ (MAB's corner stepped into the ring when Jones dropped Barrera) and second by UD.

So much for historical ignorance and not facing left-overs....

[Sweat]

That is, if COWARD MARCO ANTONIO BARRERA has the balls of a man to fight PAC again. As things stand, he's holding on to his chastity belts so damn hard he's looking like a fluke.

When you're an elite, you prove it by beating other elites. Not fighting noobs who were once former sparring mates. lol! That's a clear sign of a COWARD. lol!

hey, are u filipino?

[Manny_P]

hey, are u filipino?

he's got Filipino disses on locked, so he must be. nyahahahaha!

[Bahamut Zero]

1) Words like "sissy" and "coward" cannot be used when dscribing MAB, except it seems if you are a Pac fan who is blinded by your ignorance of the long history of the sport.

2)We all know Pac KO'd Marco. So that makes Pac a featherweight knockout artist? I don't think so. Pac has gone the distance with both Marquez and Morales, not getting a win in either bout. Although Pac clearly beat Barrera, MAB stayed in there for 11 rounds of ass-whoopin'.

3)Also, if you think Barrera is a "coward" for taking Pac's shots for 11 rounds, clearly getting his assed handed to him, but still throwing and fighting, you are ****ed up, really. That's not the stuff of cowards.

4)Truth is, Pac is the fighter that has not yet proven himself to be a dominant force against the top-tier Feathers. Pac is definitely worthy of facing the best guys, and Pac's speed and power are a thing to behold, and he has warior heart, but Pac remains 1-1-1 in the big Feather fights.

5)If Pac looses to Barerra, which I predict he will, he will be relegated to "contender" status, as he should be, since he'll be wearing a record of 1-2-1 as a top Feather. Nobody will be knocked out in the fight either, so I suppose that makes for a boring fight, eh?

1)THEN WHAT DO YOU CALL BARRERA THEN...A CHICKEN? WHAT MAKES YOU THINK THAT MAB AIN'T FEARING MANNY (REMATCH)? MAN, PAC CALLS OUT BARRERA 60 TIMES PER MINUTE! WHAT'S MAB REPLY AGAIN?!

2)PAC FLOORED MAB 3X(ERIC CAN'T), PAC FLOORED JMM 3X (WHO ELSE?). PAC 'LIFTED' THAT BATTERY, PAC FLOORED VELASQUEZ (SOME SAYS HE WAS NEVER FLOORED BEFORE)! THE ONLY TIMES IT WENT THE DISTANCE AFTER ALMOST 10(?) YEARS WAS AGAINST MORALES AT 130 (PAC'S 1ST FIGHT AT JR. LIGHTWEIGHT) AND JMM (BECAUSE HE WAS LUCKY AS MANNY_P SAID ) YOU AIN'T CALLING THAT A KO ARTIST?! WHAT ARE YOU SMOKING? A GODZHAND?!

3)BECAUSE HE CAN'T BACK-OUT IN THE MIDDLE OF THE FIGHT? 'WHY'D THEY FEED ME INTO THIS LITTLE TIGER!' - MAB. AW ****! IT'S TOO LATE!

4)EASILY THE MOST IGNORANT POST FOR THE WEEK. WHO ELSE FOUGHT THE BIG 3 MEXICANS IN A ROW (ALMOST) AND SCORED 1-1-1, 2-1 UNOFFICIALLY THEN DUCKED AFTERWARDS?

5)ENOUGH OF YOU, PIECE OF CANADIAN ****!

YOU MAY SHUT THE **** UP! YOU'VE BEEN PWNED!

[AIR_KENG]

who has the much better skills and accuracy.

i dont think pacquiao has better speed, and not necessarily more power at 130. barrera hurt morales in their fight at 130 more than pacquiao did.

stamina? please both have great stamina

say pac has better speed, and power, barrera still has better skills and i think that will carry him to victory this time.

barrera will be more aware of pacmans style this time and prepare the right way.

barrera always hurt morales IMHO... so the weight was no factor