arum who cares ????? REALLY. we all know manny could beat clottey with an arm tied behind his back quit reminding us of how much of a crap fight this is, how this helps your ppvs i do not know.
Comments Thread For: Manny Pacquiao Can Fight Clottey Tomorrow, Says Arum
Collapse
-
-
well ill tell you why because jmm clearly outboxed manny again and HANDILY outconnected HIM IN BOTH FIGHTs,ESPECIALLY THE SECOND, THAT IN CONJUNCTION WITH WINNING MORE ROUNDS, ALTOGETHER, And ITS HARD to not see how jmm won, whats the point in manny scoring FLASH knockdown in the 3rd, if he loses 3/4 of all the rest of the fight? jmm had manny bleeding and he clearly couldnt see at the end of the second fight the momentum wasnt in mannys favor, he sure didnt look like a winner . also every pacfan is quick to point out judging errors in the 1st bout but how do you get out- connected by 30 shots and still win??it was an obviously biased judge, also one of the judges in the 2nd bout is a long time very close freind of freddy roachs family, which is the same guy that gave manny the 1point margin win. mannys head in that fight looks like a bobble head doll, he looks like hes giving a boxing glove head, that is why a lot of people dont feel he won at all, it was a gift to keep the manny pac express going clearly, close ? yes. but manny a winner in that fight ? no way in hell. he won that fight ,on paper maybe.i was completely not biased when i watched both fights and i love jm marquez, however i had pac winning by one round in the 2nd fight, and i think he got the right decision. in the first one he clearly got outboxed and i think marquez probably won except the whole 3 knockdowns in the 1st, and the judge fuccked that up, clements scored it 113-113 but didnt give pac a 10-6 round for the first , which he should have. so even though i think marquez was the better man in that one, pac did get screwed out of the sd. i personally dont see how some people think marquez clearly beat pac in the 2nd though, that really mind boggles me, if anyhthing it was a draw. like i said though i had manny by 1.Comment
-
if manny won soo convincigly why did he get outconnected by 30 punches most of those powershots??and why do soo many experts think he didnt win? to me a guy that gets hit 30 more times isnt no winner ,even if he scored AN EARLY FLASH KNOCKDOWN.people say judges dont judge based on who gets hit more, well boxing is the last time i checked i**** and not get hit, judges have been wrong sooo many times this is just another example, plus he works for bob arum that old jackal always has judges paid off like in the first mayweather fight against jlc, then the clottey cotto fight ....crooked judges thats all there is to it or at the very least biased judges.its hard to believe that fringe benefits wont buy a 1point win.i was completely not biased when i watched both fights and i love jm marquez, however i had pac winning by one round in the 2nd fight, and i think he got the right decision. in the first one he clearly got outboxed and i think marquez probably won except the whole 3 knockdowns in the 1st, and the judge fuccked that up, clements scored it 113-113 but didnt give pac a 10-6 round for the first , which he should have. so even though i think marquez was the better man in that one, pac did get screwed out of the sd. i personally dont see how some people think marquez clearly beat pac in the 2nd though, that really mind boggles me, if anyhthing it was a draw. like i said though i had manny by 1.Comment
-
pac marquez was no robbery. it was close but pac deserved it because he got the kd which was the decider, howeve,r floyd v castillo 1 was a robbery.if manny won soo convincigly why did he get outconnected by 30 punches most of those powershots??and why do soo many experts think he didnt win? to me a guy that gets hit 30 more times isnt no winner ,even if he scored AN EARLY FLASH KNOCKDOWN.people say judges dont judge based on who gets hit more, well boxing is the last time i checked i**** and not get hit, judges have been wrong sooo many times this is just another example, plus he works for bob arum that old jackal always has judges paid off like in the first mayweather fight against jlc, then the clottey cotto fight ....crooked judges thats all there is to it or at the very least biased judges.its hard to believe that fringe benefits wont buy a 1point win.Comment
-
I'll put it this way, I've lost respect for manny pacquiao ever since he bitched out of the third fight against marquez. He's a cherry picking steroids user. I mean seriously what the f**k is so hard about taking a 40 MILLION DOLLAR BLOOD TEST. God all these pacquiao fans piss me the hell off, they're single minded and racist it just gets on my nerves..Comment
-
-
Yea hype him up even more than what his hype already is. Arum wants to throw Clottey under the bus. Pacquiao last two fights was against top rank fighters which is easier to make than fighters promoted by other promotions. I wonder how much he offered Clottey to jump into this fight. Arum is a **** and sucks the life out of boxing.Out of respect to Clottey Arum shouldnt favor Pac the way he has. We all know Pac brings the cash but he should at least pertend to have both fighters interest in mind. He was kinda neutral for Pac vs Cotto so he should do the same now. He already picked Pac to win witch I thought was direspectful since he also promotes Clottey. He should act like Clottey has a shot, that way it helps sell the fight. Build Clottey up as this monster that can not be hurt. That way if Pac wins it looks even more impressive.Comment
-
You're 100 percent correct and it really is that simple.Out of respect to Clottey Arum shouldnt favor Pac the way he has. We all know Pac brings the cash but he should at least pertend to have both fighters interest in mind. He was kinda neutral for Pac vs Cotto so he should do the same now. He already picked Pac to win witch I thought was direspectful since he also promotes Clottey. He should act like Clottey has a shot, that way it helps sell the fight. Build Clottey up as this monster that can not be hurt. That way if Pac wins it looks even more impressive.Comment
-
Thanks for the info. I was trying to find out more info about this subject but its hard when you search and only peoples blogs or posts come up only siting the hbo reference of xylocane.Ronnie stop trying to spread fake news, asking questions you know the answer to. Dude knows they are false and still ask.
Xylocaine's Tested For and its Banned in Nevada.
De La Hoya was given a shot of Lidocaine the day of the injury to numb the cut area so the stitches could be taken. Lidocaine is a substance banned by the Nevada State Athletic Commission. But Marc Ratner, CEO of the commission, said there is no violation as long as De La Hoya informed the commission when he took it and why.
Kizer confirmed yesterday that lidocaine is banned for use by boxers within a week of a bout. “If lidocaine is injected,” he said, “the pain receptors in the boxer may not work and he may not know if he is hurt.” He also confirmed that lidocaine would be tested for after the bout, at the Quest Diagnostics laboratory in the city.
The latest breaking UK, US, world, business and sport news from The Times and The Sunday Times. Go beyond today's headlines with in-depth analysis and comment.
Nevada boxing officials said yesterday they would fine and probably suspend Lloyd Honeyghan. They said the British fighter tested positive for the painkilling drug lidocaine after losing his World Boxing Council welterweight title to Marlon Starling on Feb. 4.
http://www.nytimes.com/1989/02/18/sp...l?pagewanted=1
Tested as far back as 1989
Mayweather has also fought in Portland, New Jersey, Florida, Michigan, and California since 03'.Comment
Comment