If Mayweather dont need Pacquiao...
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
And??
It literally means precisely *** all. This is boxing......you don't win fights by substituting a fighter as a proxy for another......
That logic is flawed..... we can say Mosley annihilated Margarito in 9.......what did Marg do to Cotto???
Comment
-
Comment
-
Cotto has 1 loss and u call it washed up fighter??Did you start watching Boxing last year?
Mosley fought a PRIME Cotto who was unbeaten, and a lot of people think that was a draw or a Mosley win anyway.
Pacquiao fought a Cotto who was washed up and had been battered by Margarito and Clottey.
Plus triangle theories don't work.

Pacquiao has 3 loss and KO 2x and been battered in his early years but he is now dominating.
Washup, Shot fighter, Past his PRIME are only EXCUSES lol
Comment
-
Mosley defeated a mentally-troubled Margacheato.
Mosley defeated Margarito w/o his cemented gloves lol
*****s are really ignorant bastards hahahaComment
-
Its often the interviewers who bring up Manny's name, cause its a fight we all want to see. Neither fighter needs each other, its just that the fans want to see the fight happen... massive difference.Comment
-
Comment
-
Floyd don't bring uip Pacquiao name everytime someone asks him about Pacquiao he says he focused on Shane Mosley
The question should be why does Roach need to always say they are going to fight Mayweather next to promote Manny's fightsComment
Comment