Originally posted by Runw/knives
Wlad vs Valuev, Brock, and Samuel Peters
Collapse
-
whatever. calling TOS v Wlad one of the most exciting fights in recent history is a much finer example of nuthuggung than my unbiased opinion is of hating. I have more vested interest in a healthy, strong Wlad who *can* bring excitement to the division than I do in hating him. I've just seen nothing in the past coupla years that shows me he can. -
Of course. I never cleared myself of those accusations. All I simply mentioned.....was Wlad was exciting to me. Then you went balls describing how he was not. LOL!Originally posted by vB Martinwhatever. calling TOS v Wlad one of the most exciting fights in recent history is a much finer example of nuthuggung than my unbiased opinion is of hating.
Never pay again for live sex! | Hot girls doing naughty stuff for free! | Chat for free!Comment
-
No he hasn't. Jefferson, TOS, and McCline (when he wants to) all have loads of power. Wlad's problem has been against good punchers with great chins; Brewster, Puritty, and Sanders (even though his chin wasn't really tested by Wlad).Originally posted by NautilusWlad has lost every single fight against good punchers.Comment
-
I would say Brock has the best chance at beating him. Brock has a damn chin. 90% of heavyweights would have been KO'd by that shot he took from McCline.
I don't think that much of Sam Peter yet; someone should upload his fight on ShoBox vs. Pudar prior to him KO'ing a C-level fighter in Jeremy Williams that created this "he's a monster" myth...
If he can't outbox Valuev, he should stick to working his brother's corner...Comment
-
Comment