The previous example was quite off but it justified the ANALOGY. The same at what have you posted.
If we are going to relate what have you posted with Pac case' - Pac is not a SUSPECT, he's being ACCUSED w/o solid proof or ground considering the FACT that he didn't failed any single drug tests done by the authorized governing body w/c is the NSAC.
If we are going to relate what have you posted with Pac case' - Pac is not a SUSPECT, he's being ACCUSED w/o solid proof or ground considering the FACT that he didn't failed any single drug tests done by the authorized governing body w/c is the NSAC.

Comment