Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Thread To End ALL Threads: Mayweather vs Smaller Men

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    Originally posted by KING 2K10 View Post
    That was only 2 fights... And it was 3 years ago(2007). And it don't matter because like TS has stated many time; They moved up in weight.. So of course they are gonna be lighter..And actually I don't think Hatton was lighter that night but it don't matter because Floyd has been coming up in weight and fighting the heavier fighters his whole career.
    may 5th 2007. we're in february already. we're 3 months short of 4 years of that fight. and like i said....that's 7 fights out of 40.

    TS started the thread to **** on Pacquiao to make it seem like pacquiao is this massive dude who picks on little guys. But pacquiao has been fighting bigger, heavier fighters more consistently in his career. Just his last 2 fights this past year pacquiao was the smaller guy on fight night.

    Comment


    • #52
      Originally posted by shadeyfizzle View Post
      may 5th 2007. we're in february already. we're 3 months short of 4 years of that fight. and like i said....that's 7 fights out of 40.

      TS started the thread to **** on Pacquiao to make it seem like pacquiao is this massive dude who picks on little guys. But pacquiao has been fighting bigger, heavier fighters more consistently in his career. Just his last 2 fights this past year pacquiao was the smaller guy on fight night.
      Dude.I'm not trying to pick out your flaws but 2007-2010= 3 years. 7+3=10.

      And i'm not sure how he is making it seem like Pac only fights little guys. We all know thats not true.(7 weight division champ!).. Maybe I missed something. But from what I have seen, it just shows how Mayweather has been fighting heavier fighters virtually his whole career.. He can't post every single tale of the tape but just watch some old mayweather fights and you'll see..And everyone always wants to say Mayweather only fights small guys because of his last 2 fights-BULL****!

      Comment


      • #53
        Originally posted by KING 2K10 View Post
        Dude.I'm not trying to pick out your flaws but 2007-2010= 3 years. 7+3=10.

        And i'm not sure how he is making it seem like Pac only fights little guys. We all know thats not true.(7 weight division champ!).. Maybe I missed something. But from what I have seen, it just shows how Mayweather has been fighting heavier fighters virtually his whole career.. He can't post every single tale of the tape but just watch some old mayweather fights and you'll see..And everyone always wants to say Mayweather only fights small guys because of his last 2 fights-BULL****!

        Excuse my math. It's 2am where i'm from and i've knocked back a few.

        floyd doesnt always fight smaller fighters but there's definitely just as many fights in which floyd was the bigger the guy as he's fought being the smaller guy. Not a good or bad thing....it's normal. And it doesnt change the fact that he hasnt weighed in on fight night since the delahoya fight. Floyd stans were trying to justify floyd not fighting any of the top welters as floyd was a small welter that could make 140 if he wanted to. in reality we dont even know if hatton was the bigger guy on fight night against floyd because there was no fight night weighin.

        Comment


        • #54
          Originally posted by shadeyfizzle View Post
          This thead is full of fail. 7 fights out 40??? Not to mention Floyd hasnt weighed in on fight night since that delahoya fight which was 4 years ago now.
          Full of fail? and what do you mean 7 fights out of 40?

          Name the the other 33 smaller fighters that Floyd fought.

          Comment


          • #55
            Originally posted by shadeyfizzle View Post
            may 5th 2007. we're in february already. we're 3 months short of 4 years of that fight. and like i said....that's 7 fights out of 40.

            TS started the thread to **** on Pacquiao to make it seem like pacquiao is this massive dude who picks on little guys. But pacquiao has been fighting bigger, heavier fighters more consistently in his career. Just his last 2 fights this past year pacquiao was the smaller guy on fight night.
            Floyd is the smaller guy in almost ALL his fights.

            Comment


            • #56
              Originally posted by shadeyfizzle View Post
              Excuse my math. It's 2am where i'm from and i've knocked back a few.

              floyd doesnt always fight smaller fighters but there's definitely just as many fights in which floyd was the bigger the guy as he's fought being the smaller guy. Not a good or bad thing....it's normal. And it doesnt change the fact that he hasnt weighed in on fight night since the delahoya fight. Floyd stans were trying to justify floyd not fighting any of the top welters as floyd was a small welter that could make 140 if he wanted to. in reality we dont even know if hatton was the bigger guy on fight night against floyd because there was no fight night weighin.
              Yea, but I haven't been noticing too many fight night weigh in's lately..Maybe I just wasn't paying attention or don't remember but it seems like a lot of fights have not been showing the fight night weights lately. Pac-cotto was one I remember and I know more but I can only remember that off top of my head..

              Comment


              • #57
                That Oscar picture has to be wrong, no way Oscar was only 154 on fight night.

                The smaller men thing is only because of Hatton and Marquez, since he was fighting those guys rather than the welters he should have been fighting.

                Comment


                • #58
                  Originally posted by bojangles1987 View Post
                  That Oscar picture has to be wrong, no way Oscar was only 154 on fight night.

                  The smaller men thing is only because of Hatton and Marquez, since he was fighting those guys rather than the welters he should have been fighting.
                  I dont think we can blame him for fighting Hatton. It was the biggest money fight in the sport against an undefeated fighter. That fight was HUGE.

                  JMM was a tune up. I rather it bee JMM then Golden Johnson, Jennings or Gomez.

                  Comment


                  • #59
                    Originally posted by Tarantino View Post
                    I dont think we can blame him for fighting Hatton. It was the biggest money fight in the sport against an undefeated fighter. That fight was HUGE.

                    JMM was a tune up. I rather it bee JMM then Golden Johnson, Jennings or Gomez.
                    I personally never liked the Hatton fight happening. I would hear people making a case for Hatton winning and think, the same Hatton who went life and death with Luis Collazo? It was always ridiculous to me.

                    There is no excuse for JMM. Just Floyd Mayweather coming back would have done really good PPV numbers so Marquez wasn't needed for that, so I can't understand any justification for it.

                    Comment


                    • #60
                      Originally posted by bojangles1987 View Post
                      I personally never liked the Hatton fight happening. I would hear people making a case for Hatton winning and think, the same Hatton who went life and death with Luis Collazo? It was always ridiculous to me.

                      There is no excuse for JMM. Just Floyd Mayweather coming back would have done really good PPV numbers so Marquez wasn't needed for that, so I can't understand any justification for it.
                      The thing with JMM is there was no tune ups available for July 19th. JMM was the best choice.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP