Fighter of the Decade????

[cortdawg25]

so you have ledwaba (title fight), julio (former titlist), and sanchez (unification fight) in italics for pac.

Why are people paying attention to this? Not saying the two wins and a draw need to be blown up, but if you don't know who those guys are it says more about your lack of qualification to ask the question than anything else.

ledwaba and julio ain't nobody...u act like they some world beaters! C'mon son! And sanchez, he didn't even beat!

[crold1]

ledwaba and julio ain't nobody...u act like they some world beaters! C'mon son! And sanchez, he didn't even beat!

You said who are they, meaning you might not have known. If you didn't, you're too ****** to ask the questions you're asking and need to go do some research and get back to the world.

Son.

[gqjohnb]

exactly....and this our fighter of the decade??? Bs....thei what have u done for me lately has no merit in regards for criteria for the fighter of the decade.


2000 -2003, he fought no one!!! Towards th end of the decade, he fights floyd's leftover and now he greater than srr....gtfoh!!!!

I don't think it does but it was a big reason I think and it like most things in this world was somewhat political. More people like pac soooooooo... There is a very strong argument for floyd on this though for the people who say just bump this thread. The fighter of the decade is not as important to me anyway personally. I hope you guys aren't surprised manny got it...floyd's always been treated like an ugly step child by "the powers that be". He's like the Allen Iverson of Boxing.

[ummmid]

Losing to a washed up morales......& then beating a washed up morales twice isnt impressive

Beating Berrera the first time, impressive...beating Berrera 3 years later when he is undoubtebly washed up..not impressive

Getting outboxed by Marquez in 2004 and then gettin outboxed 4 years later...not impressive

Fighting the weakest belt holder@135 lbs...not impressive

fighting a drained Oscar who wasnt @ 145lbs in over 8 years...not impressive

Fighting A declined Hatton 2 years AFTER mayweather ko'ed him..not impressive

fighting the WW champ at a catchweight..not impressive

^^^^^you are telling me this is criteria for fighter of the decade?

gotta love hindsight. i'm pretty sure you had the same line of thought before each of those fights were made amirite?

most of those fights, pac was either an underdog or the odds were pretty even, he just beats his opponents so bad that they look waay worse after his fights.

[gqjohnb]

gotta love hindsight. i'm pretty sure you had the same line of thought before each of those fights were made amirite?

most of those fights, pac was either an underdog or the odds were pretty even, he just beats his opponents so bad that they look waay worse after his fights.

He wasn't an underdog because they were soooo good at the time he was underdog because pac's career was so mediocre and he lost to mediocre guys before then. I think too many people on here measure fights by who's the underdog... a win should be measured simply by the opponent, the timing, and the state of the opponent... not whether you were expected to win or not.

[ummmid]

there not giving a black fighter "fighter of the decade" unless they absolutely have it......lol

yep, damn those racist pricks... DAMN THEM ALL TO HELL!!!

[sNiTcH]

ledwaba and julio ain't nobody...u act like they some world beaters! C'mon son! And sanchez, he didn't even beat!

I thought you dont know them? LOLS OWNED! "peeleft:"peeleft:

[cortdawg25]

you said who are they, meaning you might not have known. If you didn't, you're too ****** to ask the questions you're asking and need to go do some research and get back to the world.

Son.

u tell me....what makes them someone?

[ummmid]

He wasn't an underdog because they were soooo good at the time he was underdog because pac's career was so mediocre and he lost to mediocre guys before then. I think too many people on here measure fights by who's the underdog... a win should be measured simply by the opponent, the timing, and the state of the opponent... not whether you were expected to win or not.

point taken. what i'm trying to explain here tho is the fact that people are saying like morales was severely washed up when pac fought him. sure, he didn't look that great against raheem but that was also after his first fight with pac which was brutal as hell. you can say that it might have been the result of all his wars with MAB but did he really look as bad until after he fought pac?

and yeah i'd like to add that the manner of how he beats them should be also added for all those criteria.

[cortdawg25]

he wasn't an underdog because they were soooo good at the time he was underdog because pac's career was so mediocre and he lost to mediocre guys before then. I think too many people on here measure fights by who's the underdog... A win should be measured simply by the opponent, the timing, and the state of the opponent... Not whether you were expected to win or not.

i would give u more karma if i could...low expectations has got manny a lot of these accolades.

Could floyd get foty by beating a washed up great and a contender in a year.


Floyd has to beat an oscar at 154 and ko a undfeated and top p4p fighter in ricky hatton to squeak by for foty!!!