Pacquiao would stop Shane Mosley in 10 rounds.

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jthoang
    Contender
    • Aug 2009
    • 392
    • 15
    • 1
    • 6,484

    #41
    Originally posted by Ch@mpBox@PR
    Wrong!

    Burner is just a fool, looking for attention.

    1.Thing is too say pac might beat Shane another one is to say he KOs Shane.
    Edwin Valero sucks.

    Comment

    • Schmerzen
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Oct 2009
      • 2554
      • 121
      • 146
      • 10,313

      #42
      Originally posted by King Burner
      Shane doesnt have the legs to corner Manny.

      He wont beat Pac to the punch.

      Cotto was faster then Shane.

      He also doesnt have the counter punching ability.

      Pacquiao would tee off on him and go in and out peppering him with shots.

      Pacquiao by KO 10.
      and the winner is...
      not that thinner kid, bandanas tattoos my fist never bruise

      Comment

      • Piper the Great
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Sep 2007
        • 2325
        • 32
        • 73
        • 9,128

        #43
        you a damn fool boy

        Comment

        • Grand Champ
          Banned
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Jul 2007
          • 12782
          • 968
          • 1,313
          • 23,079

          #44
          Nobody stops Shane period. Like saying someone stops Bernard or Mayweather. Doesn't happen.

          Comment

          • Frank Martin
            The Transporter
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • May 2009
            • 2086
            • 100
            • 60
            • 8,551

            #45
            I'll only believe it when I see it.

            Comment

            • pasawayako
              Undisputed Champion
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Dec 2009
              • 15348
              • 639
              • 194
              • 151,963

              #46
              if mosley will fight the way he fight against margarito then i will say pac ko shane in less than 10 rounds.

              Comment

              • bojangles1987
                bo jungle
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Jul 2009
                • 41118
                • 1,326
                • 357
                • 63,028

                #47
                Wow, I completely disagree. Shane is fast, hits hard, and has a tremendous chin. He loves to brawl, and so does Pac. It would come down to a slugfest and there is no way I would pick Pac over Mosley in a slugfest.

                I actually think Mosley is the worst matchup for Pac in the welterweight division.

                Comment

                • educator06
                  Interim Champion
                  Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                  • Jan 2010
                  • 589
                  • 15
                  • 6
                  • 6,715

                  #48
                  this is a bit ridiculious.

                  Comment

                  • krispy kreme
                    Fiendin for toilet water
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Feb 2008
                    • 10832
                    • 358
                    • 898
                    • 18,913

                    #49
                    Shane is too rugged for Pacquiao to KO, he doesn't weaken in those later rounds either, like Cotto.

                    Comment

                    • tesla_power
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Jun 2009
                      • 2050
                      • 66
                      • 87
                      • 8,744

                      #50
                      Pac KOing Shane? Is this really burner. Amazing but will still disagree. It unlikely unless he grows old of a sudden. Maybe 2-3 years from now, this is more likely.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP