Roach Tells It Everytime. Manny is a Cherry Picker.
Collapse
-
I mean it is a normal thing to trash talk opponents before a fight but even after fights he says that... it makes me really wonder why would you take credit away from your fighter winning a fight... but as of late it's really hard anyways to understand Roachs comments or mind set at times... don't know what's going on him with himI don't get it... Roach pretty much let's everyone know that they are, and have been cherry picking the perfect opponents for Pacman for a while now.
He always says they aren't that good.. He's shot now.. Something like that. It's obvious cherry picking. His last qoute goes something like this. "Ive been studying tape. He isnt that good" Referring to Clottey.
How someone thinks Floyd ducked Manny is beyond me. It's obvious Roach or Arum thought Floyd was to good. That fight will never happen.

Comment
-
The difference is when Roach says "the guy is not very good" he means "I am a world class trainer and even if the guy is among the best P4P or in his division I have just the perfect plan to exploit his flaws and see my fighter, who happens to be quite talented, winning comfortably".
What the regular internet user means by "the guy is not very good" is "I sit behind a keyboard and have never stepped up against opposition worth 0,00000001% of the guy, yet I'll say he is crap just for the sake of it".
Seriously, there's nothing wrong with Roach talking about flaws in Pac's opponents as long as they prove to be true. It is actually quite refreshing compared to the more usual building up of the opponent just to be able to state afterwards that you just beat the greatest of all time, which is not true in 99,9% of the cases.Comment
-
14 days or 1 day, doesnt matter. Pac himself says he does not feel right mentally after drawing blood.
Should Manny take the tests- he should, but not the terms that were dictated by Floyd. Floyd should have went through the proper channels.
"Is that fact, or just the confirmed ******* fact?"
Bro, the mind games part is pretty much common sense. Look at Floyds recent radio interview where he cant believe Pac is so extraordinary, he is trying to bring Pac down mentally to "even up the playing field". Floyd's insecurities are being brought out.Comment
-
If that's what he meant, then he would say it.The difference is when Roach says "the guy is not very good" he means "I am a world class trainer and even if the guy is among the best P4P or in his division I have just the perfect plan to exploit his flaws and see my fighter, who happens to be quite talented, winning comfortably".
What the regular internet user means by "the guy is not very good" is "I sit behind a keyboard and have never stepped up against opposition worth 0,00000001% of the guy, yet I'll say he is crap just for the sake of it".Comment
-
Exactly. He talks crap before AND after the fight.I mean it is a normal thing to trash talk opponents before a fight but even after fights he says that... it makes me really wonder why would you take credit away from your fighter winning a fight... but as of late it's really hard anyways to understand Roachs comments or mind set at times... don't know what's going on him with himComment
-
Comment
-
No that basically is what he says. He sends a statment to Clottey when he says he watched his tapes and found something that will make it an easy fight for Pac. Because in the past, those claims proved to be true most of the time. Now Clottey is not the most easy one to intimidate, but I bet it will make him at least think a bit, which means Roach already got into his head. I think that's all there is to it.Comment
-
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA...boy u pacfans really crack me up..The difference is when Roach says "the guy is not very good" he means "I am a world class trainer and even if the guy is among the best P4P or in his division I have just the perfect plan to exploit his flaws and see my fighter, who happens to be quite talented, winning comfortably".
What the regular internet user means by "the guy is not very good" is "I sit behind a keyboard and have never stepped up against opposition worth 0,00000001% of the guy, yet I'll say he is crap just for the sake of it".
Seriously, there's nothing wrong with Roach talking about flaws in Pac's opponents as long as they prove to be true. It is actually quite refreshing compared to the more usual building up of the opponent just to be able to state afterwards that you just beat the greatest of all time, which is not true in 99,9% of the cases.Comment
Comment