Who has the better resume?
Who has the better RESUME, Froch or Kessler?
Collapse
-
Who has the better RESUME, Froch or Kessler?
54Froch (Taylor, Direll, Pascall)70.37%38Kessler (er.....Mundine?)29.63%16Tags: None -
Kessler had two world titles. Some of his best wins are underrated because Americans and Brits are not familiar with them. But Beyer and several others were good fighters at the time, and in the Ring rankings.
Froch has a FAR better resume from the past year or two, though. -
This. This annnnnddd..... This.Kessler had two world titles. Some of his best wins are underrated because Americans and Brits are not familiar with them. But Beyer and several others were good fighters at the time, and in the Ring rankings.
Froch has a FAR better resume from the past year or two, though.Comment
-
-
-
I can see Froch copying the calzaghe blueprint on how to beat Kessler...Just the way Ward copied it
Kessler just cant fight on the inside...when someone ties him up he has no clue how to fight his way out
Comment
-
I agree with this.Kessler had two world titles. Some of his best wins are underrated because Americans and Brits are not familiar with them. But Beyer and several others were good fighters at the time, and in the Ring rankings.
Froch has a FAR better resume from the past year or two, though.
Many of Kessler's wins are against the likes of Beyer, Mundine, etc., who competed in a mostly European division, and were not followed closely here. He does hold wins over several top ten ranked opponents.
However, Froch's resume of late is superior, whether you agree that he won all those fights or not.Comment
-
-
Alot of action. Kessler will knock Froch down a couple time. Kessler by UD.
Froch has a better resume though.Comment
Comment