Comments Thread For: Roach: "Pacquiao Wants Mayweather in The Worst Way"

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • boxingfan76
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • May 2009
    • 4184
    • 197
    • 218
    • 10,349

    #151
    Originally posted by solly6
    you are very unintelligent. no experts had marquez whipping pac's ass. at most you could have had jmm winning by 1 round in either fight. i thought pac one both but they were very close. they were fought at 130 which is a lot different than fighting jmm at 144 and missing weight and weighing 146. cotto has only been stopped twice both very late in the fight. margs could have had loaded gloves for all we know. pac dominated cotto a lot better better than margs and the only reason he didn't knock him out earlier is that cotto was running for the last 5 rounds.
    were u born yesterday?? a lot of experst feel that pac lost to jmm, jim lampley max kellermanand everyone that isnt a *******, give it up pac lost those fights , its not like u canlie about it, pacs head looks like a bobble head doll, in both fights, he looks like hes giving a boxing glove head.

    Comment

    • solly6
      Interim Champion
      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
      • Aug 2008
      • 581
      • 30
      • 13
      • 6,697

      #152
      Originally posted by boxingfan76
      i believe floyd has a lot of pride as does any fighter and naturally would say his hand is hurt, you know what in tough fights u can break a hand or worse.floyd did convingly win the second fight. as far as pac vs jmm goes, pac definitley lost both in my opinion and most experts, but telling anybody that on a ******* dominated site like this one, is pointless. at very best i can say for pac is he shouldve won the first fight based on the 3 knockdowns and he totally lost the second fight.one 3rd rnd knockdown doesnt make up for all those rnds he lost and the outconnects, jmm definitley won the 2nd bout.
      don't know how you think pac lost the 2nd. i had pac winning by one round without the knockdown. these are my 2 fav fighters i am not bias. i think marquez would have had him if he didn't get that terrible cut late. after the cut pac one those last rounds.

      Comment

      • boxingfan76
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • May 2009
        • 4184
        • 197
        • 218
        • 10,349

        #153
        Originally posted by solly6
        you are very unintelligent. no experts had marquez whipping pac's ass. at most you could have had jmm winning by 1 round in either fight. i thought pac one both but they were very close. they were fought at 130 which is a lot different than fighting jmm at 144 and missing weight and weighing 146. cotto has only been stopped twice both very late in the fight. margs could have had loaded gloves for all we know. pac dominated cotto a lot better better than margs and the only reason he didn't knock him out earlier is that cotto was running for the last 5 rounds.
        yeah and cotto was undefeated agisnt margs, but coming off of 2 savage beating against pac, even roach said he feels cotto is shot thats why they fought him instead of mosley.thats straight from roaches mouth.

        Comment

        • GRUSTLER
          Undisputed champion
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Dec 2008
          • 14118
          • 444
          • 115
          • 20,934

          #154
          Originally posted by boxingfan76
          i believe floyd has a lot of pride as does any fighter and naturally would say his hand is hurt, you know what in tough fights u can break a hand or worse.floyd did convingly win the second fight. as far as pac vs jmm goes, pac definitley lost both in my opinion and most experts, but telling anybody that on a ******* dominated site like this one, is pointless. at very best i can say for pac is he shouldve won the first fight based on the 3 knockdowns and he totally lost the second fight.one 3rd rnd knockdown doesnt make up for all those rnds he lost and the outconnects, jmm definitley won the 2nd bout.
          I agree. THe second Pac/JMM fight could have went to Marquez.

          Comment

          • GRUSTLER
            Undisputed champion
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Dec 2008
            • 14118
            • 444
            • 115
            • 20,934

            #155
            Originally posted by solly6
            i agree pac had very tough fights with jmm who was the p4p #2 fighter in the world when he was at superfeather and lightweight. castillo beat floyd in their first fight most boxing experts had castillio winning by a couple rounds. and jmm is a better fighter than castillo without a doubt. do not compare the two please.
            Castillo was a beast at 135 when Floyd fought him. He had the power,
            pressure and chin in his prime and would have hammered Pac and JMM
            at 135 at that time.

            Comment

            • solly6
              Interim Champion
              Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
              • Aug 2008
              • 581
              • 30
              • 13
              • 6,697

              #156
              Originally posted by boxingfan76
              were u born yesterday?? a lot of experst feel that pac lost to jmm, jim lampley max kellermanand everyone that isnt a *******, give it up pac lost those fights , its not like u canlie about it, pacs head looks like a bobble head doll, in both fights, he looks like hes giving a boxing glove head.
              what about ledderman, emanuel steward and lennox lewis????? i respect lampley and kellerman's opinion but not every expert had marquez winning **** eater. and either way it was a very close fight and pac knocked marquez's ass down which was the deciding factor. you know nothing about the sport go jerk it to some mma action and get of this site.

              Comment

              • hanzoh74
                CounterposteR
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Nov 2008
                • 1136
                • 28
                • 4
                • 9,239

                #157
                Originally posted by GRUSTLER
                Translation: Manny Pacquiao ducked Floyd Mayweather Jr.
                How come everyone can't see that and instead insist Floyd
                killed the fight? Arum, Roach and Manny made it into a circus.
                I hope Pac finally get the cojones to fight Floyd so Pac can
                get schooled. Too late in the game for Roach to be trying to
                implement a whole new strategy for Manny to take on a
                technical fighter like Floyd because whatever new game plan
                Manny uses in the ring, Floyd will counter spontaneously
                without having to learn it.
                then explain to me why FMJ uttered those words that legacy dont pay bills??

                Comment

                • solly6
                  Interim Champion
                  Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                  • Aug 2008
                  • 581
                  • 30
                  • 13
                  • 6,697

                  #158
                  Originally posted by GRUSTLER
                  Castillo was a beast at 135 when Floyd fought him. He had the power,
                  pressure and chin in his prime and would have hammered Pac and JMM
                  at 135 at that time.
                  he was very good. but he is not as good as pac or jmm at the lower weight classes. pac and jmm in their primes would beat castillo in his prime.

                  Comment

                  • boxingfan76
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • May 2009
                    • 4184
                    • 197
                    • 218
                    • 10,349

                    #159
                    Originally posted by solly6
                    don't know how you think pac lost the 2nd. i had pac winning by one round without the knockdown. these are my 2 fav fighters i am not bias. i think marquez would have had him if he didn't get that terrible cut late. after the cut pac one those last rounds.
                    the mid and late rnds were mostly marquez, pac had his moments, even the early rnds jmm was winning until he got caught by pac in th 3rd.jmm was winning the 3rd rnd up until the knockdown, the 4th was pacs. the championship rnds definitley were in jmms favor, all this doesnt matter if jmm was able to do that why wouldnt , floyd do that to a much better extent??he is younger,bigger faster, and harder to hit than jmm.im no floyd fan but cmon, it COULD be a very easy victory for floyd, its the style and technique not punching power or guts that will defeat pac.sometimes a cigar is just a cigar, u got to admit floyd has the style to beat pac and make it look easy.

                    Comment

                    • rommel357
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Aug 2009
                      • 1393
                      • 33
                      • 10
                      • 7,595

                      #160
                      I'm a huge Manny fan and have been defending him forever and will keep defending him. But to be honest, If Manny wants Floyd that bad then agree to the ****ing 14days cut off date, period. No more ****ing excuses.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP