Weight classes: which is tougher for fighters: going up or down?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • grayfist
    Just old, not wise
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Sep 2004
    • 2611
    • 152
    • 303
    • 9,016

    #1

    Weight classes: which is tougher for fighters: going up or down?

    Throughout boxing's recorded history, fighters have been going up and/or down in weight to mixed results--some, spectacularly successful (e.g., Michael Spinks and, I won't mind if you include the victor last Saturday who went up to 130), others, disastrous (e.g., Roy Jones after the Ruiz fight), and many, shades in between.

    Which is tougher: going down to a lower division or going up to a higher one?
  • mic573
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jun 2004
    • 4646
    • 98
    • 14
    • 11,280

    #2
    I would say going down because a fighter could weaken himself and his punch. Alot of people will say a fighter going down in weight would make him a bigger fighter fighting a smaller fighter but if the bigger fighter is too weak it really wouldn't matter would it. Going up could make a fighter stronger and make his punch stronger as well. If done properly a fighter could retain most of his speed also.

    Comment

    • grayfist
      Just old, not wise
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Sep 2004
      • 2611
      • 152
      • 303
      • 9,016

      #3
      Originally posted by mic573
      I would say going down because a fighter could weaken himself and his punch. Alot of people will say a fighter going down in weight would make him a bigger fighter fighting a smaller fighter but if the bigger fighter is too weak it really wouldn't matter would it. Going up could make a fighter stronger and make his punch stronger as well. If done properly a fighter could retain most of his speed also.
      Got your point, pal. Thanks!

      Comment

      • foremanfan
        Contender
        Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
        • Jan 2004
        • 161
        • 8
        • 0
        • 6,252

        #4
        I would say going down if you are naturally bigger. I think in a case like Roy Jones when he went down from heavyweight back to light heavyweight it's not such a problem if it is done right.

        Comment

        • jabsRstiff
          ! ! ! !
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Jun 2004
          • 8964
          • 498
          • 136
          • 16,167

          #5
          It's worse to go down, unless you're a fat guy.

          Seriously, you don't see fighters do it very often, & rarely successfully.

          Look at when LaLonde fought Leonard....he fought at 7lbs below his peak weight, & he looked like he had the life ****** out of him.

          I'd rather face a bigger stronger guy, after putting on a few lbs......than face a small one, after I have depleted myself.

          Comment

          • jack_the_rippuh
            I to your mom..
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • May 2004
            • 31699
            • 1,148
            • 627
            • 65,521

            #6
            Yeah, but Lalonde ******..

            Comment

            • jabsRstiff
              ! ! ! !
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Jun 2004
              • 8964
              • 498
              • 136
              • 16,167

              #7
              Originally posted by jack_the_rippuh
              Yeah, but Lalonde ******..

              How would you know ? You were even younger & dumber then, than you are now.

              Comment

              Working...
              TOP