Who has better overall "boxing" skills: De La Hoya or Mosley?

[WhoreUs!]

DLH does
better footwork
more use of feints
better defense
superior jab

[Clyde Barrow]

Oscar is a better boxer. Shane has the capacity to box but only does so sparingly. DLH was reputed as a puncher in smaller divisions but altered that style to a more technical approach when he moved up in weight. Shane has always been the same guy, kind of a puncher in a boxers body. People often connotate speed with pure boxing to describe fighters but that isn't true.

[tesla_power]

do you think Naz can at this stage?

Yes. That depends entirely on Mosley. If he is still winning to learn, I don't see why not. Maybe a good 2-4 years I think.

[Bacatit]

How many times did Mosley beat DLH??? There is your answer!

You guys have it all figured out don't you ? ....lol !!!

Oscar

Shane is a natural beast and to his credit I thiink that's the only reason he is who he is today. If Shane tried to be what Floyd is it wouldn't work for him....at least not in this stage of the game.

[Bacatit]

Doesn't mean the right person won. I forget which fight I thought DLH won vs Mosley, but I do think he won one. Just like I thought DLH beat Felix.

Trinidad not Sturm

[Bacatit]

If you fight the guy twice nad CANT beat him.....Well you may not be as skilled as him. I find it sad and funny some on here cant see this...lol

Just stop it now before you end up having to trash this account in shame.

[Bacatit]

come on mate,mosley lost the second fight imo but the judges gave it to him,dont forget he was on peds aswell for that fight and it should have been over turned in oscars favour

That doesn't matter to Pac fans.

I don't know why they post in actual boxing threads that have nothing to do with Pac.