Luevano is a tougher fight than Mtagwa.

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • KingTito
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Mar 2006
    • 9391
    • 234
    • 350
    • 22,960

    #1

    Luevano is a tougher fight than Mtagwa.

    I love both, but just because Gamboa destroyed Mtagwa doesn't mean he'll beat Lopez, and don't bring up the Lopez-Mtagwa fight. Triangle theory doesn't work. Lopez-Gamboa!!!!
  • mangler jr
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Oct 2009
    • 3237
    • 134
    • 14
    • 4,113

    #2
    Its pretty obvious.

    Mtagwa had nothing left at all.

    Comment

    • Lokotron
      Interim Champion
      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
      • Aug 2009
      • 786
      • 47
      • 80
      • 7,317

      #3
      Originally posted by KingTito
      I love both, but just because Gamboa destroyed Mtagwa doesn't mean he'll beat Lopez, and don't bring up the Lopez-Mtagwa fight. Triangle theory doesn't work. Lopez-Gamboa!!!!
      Gamboa looked impressive but, He fought a 122 pounder who weigh in at 122.5 he didn't fight as a 126 pounder.

      Comment

      • borikua
        Banned
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Jul 2004
        • 12530
        • 686
        • 745
        • 20,193

        #4
        Cotto-Foreman and Lopez-Gamboa?

        Comment

        Working...
        TOP