Luevano is a tougher fight than Mtagwa.

Collapse
X
Collapse
  • Page of 1
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • KingTito
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Mar 2006
    • 9391
    • 234
    • 350
    • 22,960
    #1

    Luevano is a tougher fight than Mtagwa.

    I love both, but just because Gamboa destroyed Mtagwa doesn't mean he'll beat Lopez, and don't bring up the Lopez-Mtagwa fight. Triangle theory doesn't work. Lopez-Gamboa!!!!
    Tags: fight, luevano, mtagwa., tougher
    • mangler jr
      Banned
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Oct 2009
      • 3237
      • 134
      • 14
      • 4,113
      #2
      Its pretty obvious.

      Mtagwa had nothing left at all.

        Comment

        • Lokotron
          Interim Champion
          Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
          • Aug 2009
          • 786
          • 47
          • 80
          • 7,317
          #3
          Originally posted by KingTito
          I love both, but just because Gamboa destroyed Mtagwa doesn't mean he'll beat Lopez, and don't bring up the Lopez-Mtagwa fight. Triangle theory doesn't work. Lopez-Gamboa!!!!
          Gamboa looked impressive but, He fought a 122 pounder who weigh in at 122.5 he didn't fight as a 126 pounder.

            Comment

            • borikua
              Banned
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Jul 2004
              • 12530
              • 686
              • 745
              • 20,193
              #4
              Cotto-Foreman and Lopez-Gamboa?

                Comment

                Previous template Next
                Working...
                TOP

                Sign In

                Forgot password?

                Register

                Get in on the latest boxing conversations in our Forum and comment on articles.
                JOIN NOW